NEED IN 12 HOURS or LESS

/in /by

After following the instructional sequence, which includes reading the required chapters and the unit lesson, please discuss the following scenario. Imagine you are a police officer and having a private conversation with a fellow officer. Unbeknownst to you, a fellow officer is recording the conversation. You are later contacted by your supervisor and informed that you are now under internal investigation for what was said on the recording. Do you believe your rights have been violated in the given scenario? Explain why or why not.

ANSWER THE ABOVE QUESTION AND THEN REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE’S RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 125 WORDS or MORE)
                                                      CLASSMATE’S POST
In this scenario, I do not feel that my rights have been violated. Based on this scenario being an on-duty conversation, I’m also considering firsthand knowledge that at any time inside or outside the patrol unit leads to a possibility of me being recorded or videotaped by my unit, Body-Worn Cameras (BWC), or by the general public.
When conversing with coworkers, conversations should remain tactful. Even if something is said “off the record”, an officer should always be mindful that he could be scrutinized at any point by any action. In the 2019 case of former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger, prosecutors introduced text messages in which Guyger made offensive statements about the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. and black colleagues on the police force (Sanchez, 2019). These text messages were from her personal mobile phone; however, they were subject to scrutinization and interpretation by parties involved and the general public. Many may see this as an invasion of privacy however I reiterate that being a public servant comes with a higher level of transparency and being subjected to scrutiny. As public servants, police officers should be held to a higher standard (Burrus, 2014).
If my conversation with a fellow officer leads to an internal investigation, I should be ready to explain and defend any accusations or statements that may have been considered a violation of department policy. Also, I should be able to elaborate on recorded information that may be apart of another investigation that I was not privy to.
As officers, we must always maintain (or attempt to maintain) public trust. While in the Auxiliary Police Academy several years ago, I was advised that someone is always watching and listening. I was further advised that I should always be mindful of personal conversations on my cell phone while inside my patrol unit, out in public, and quite frankly, while wearing the uniform.
 References:
Burres, T. (2014, December 4). A Special Prosecutor for Police. Retrieved November  13, 2019, from https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/12/04/do-cases-like-eric-garners-require-a-special-prosecutor/set-a-higher-standard-for-police-use-of-force.
 

Sanchez, R. (2019, October 2). Amber Guyger’s offensive text messages are introduced at her sentencing. Retrieved November 13, 2019, from https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/02/us/amber-guyger-trial-offensive-texts-trnd/index.html. 

A WORK PLEASE

/in /by

   PLEASE READ AND ANSWER ALL THE  QUESTIONS

We often hear people talk of their rights, but rarely do I hear someone speaking who could actually explain from where these “rights” are emanating. 

Often we hear “I know my rights” and most often that person might have the vaguest grasp of what is contained within the Constitution.  But now let us explore the SOURCE of these unalienable rights. Do you think it is the Bill of Rights (BoR)? 

Does the BoR spell out to the people what rights are being granted and is this the source of these rights?

What “rights” are given specifically to the people in any of the first ten amendments of the U. S. Constitution? 

Do the words actually say, or can you prove it was the intent of the writers, that these ten phrases are speaking to the people, or are they directed possibly someone else?

We would know which are rights granted here in the document, by reading the words of the Bill of Rights and observing if any of them speak to “the people” and say “you get this right that is specifically named here”.   Shall we look to see how many there are actually being granted by this part of the document? and how many are assumed but not explicitly enumerated?

Is there a right found here?  Read it carefully before responding

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Is there a right granted here? Carefully read because it doesn’t say way what you may think. The instruction, the take away, the writing was not directed at the people was it?

A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

This one doesn’t read like a Right as much as it does a rule about what the government may not do, as restriction on power, not and extension or granting of a right to the people.  Seems like the rights are assumed and that this document was just a list of the 10 most troubling things the founders were concerned about while forming a new government.

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Pretty sure this one was written to the government about what they cannot do to the people. Not written to the people talking about a right.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This one is laundry list of what the government may not do to a person:

  1. No secret indictments;   1.5 Allowing for temporary suspension of that restriction during times of war or public danger (see Lincoln who suspended Habeas Corpus during one such time);
  2. No Double Jeopardy—which may sound like a right but really limits the powers of the prosecution.
  3. You cannot make me testify against myself? Sounds like what the government cannot do. I could testify against myself if I wanted to, but cannot be compelled by the State to do so;
  4. The state cannot take my stuff, my freedom or my life, unless they can do so through a process of law;
  5. The State cannot take my stuff for public use unless I have been justly compensated. Again, state cannot . . . 

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

The State cannot:

  • Leave      me hanging indefinitely in jail,
  • Cook      up a bunch of people who will convict me without Due Process;
  • Get      people from another place to judge me, only from within my “area”;

The State must  give fair and full warning of the charge and reason for such charge—they cannot ambush me in a prosecution;

The State must produce those who accuse me, they cannot accuse and hide;

The State must use resources to assist me in producing people who may have information;

The State must allow me to have legal assistance, BUT does not say they have to provide it in the event that I cannot afford it

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

This one is a civil matter, but provide a venue for redress that the State must provide for matter over 20 dollars—they must provide the court, the jury, and adhere to both the process and the ruling of said jury.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

This one says the State cannot . . .

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

The last two limit what the federal government can do, saying that unless the document has specifically granted the government a power, then everything else is assumed to belong to the state government or retained by the people.  Again, not granting anything, only stating that the Federal government cannot remove them without specific authority.

So who has rights in this country? And from where do they emanate?

Response to Lauren

/in /by

 

Senior Executive Services (SES) are high level administrators in government that are highly trained in general management, having the ability to move between agencies and handle major executive level decisions. SES are so unique they can mediate between political leaders and career bureaucrats. For example, SES are equivalent to military rank/ positions however, they work for the government. SES skills are so wide and general they can get put in high positions, managing several different specialties up under them (More et al, 2018). The mission is to promote policies and programs that empower its constituent members to accomplish their vital mission responsibilities as well as advance their personal professional development. “Forty years ago, Congress set out to fix the government’s fragmented government. It worried that the political appointees who head federal agencies didn’t have solid relationships with the civil servants below them. So, it established a new corps of government workers, called the Senior Executive Service, to be the executive branch’s expert managers, linking appointees to the rank-and-file” (Kelly, 2016).

The Office of Personnel Management administers the SES program which was created by the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978. During this time SES “ensured that the executive management of the Government of the United States was responsive to the needs, policies, and goals of the Nation and other wise was of the highest quality” (Senior Executive Service-OPM, n.d.). With the current efforts at reform under the Obama Administration the SES consist of managerial, supervisory, and policy positions classified above General Schedule grade 15 or equivalent positons in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. There are two types of positions and four types of appointments in the SES: Career reserved positions and general positions are for people in the career service; career appointments, non-career appointments, limited term appointment, and limited emergency appointments. As more senior executives withdraw, the principal test confronting the Senior Executive Service (SES) is to bridge the increasing skill gap with collaborative leadership skills.

There are some areas where increased focus could lead to improvements, possibly making the leadership corps a more eye-catching decision and aiding to enhance recruit and preserve highly experienced applicants include but not limited to culture, recognition and prestige recruit and hiring, performance management, and leadership development.

“A” WORK DISCUSSION

/in /by

Marijuana was decriminalized in Canada in October 2018. Since that time, many Canadian police departments have implemented policies regarding officials using marijuana that would probably shock many Americans. For example, the Vancouver Police Department says that it will not impose any restrictions on their officers for using marijuana while off-duty. The only policy they will enforce is that all officers must be fit for duty when they report to work. It essentially holds them to the same standards as after-hours alcohol consumption.

Changes are happening in the United States as well. In Atlanta, Georgia, which is a state where marijuana use is still illegal, the Atlanta Police Department will no longer ask applicants if they have smoked marijuana and consider its use as a factor in eligibility to join the force. They claim that they have lost too many qualified candidates when asking them about marijuana smoking.

Share your opinions, from both the perspective of a criminal justice administrator working in a state where marijuana use has been decriminalized and from the perspective of a private citizen, on whether criminal justice personnel (in states where it is legal) should be allowed to use marijuana while off-duty. Explain the rationale for your opinions.

REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE’S RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTION AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 150 WORDS or MORE)

                                                          CLASSMATE’S POST

Marijuana was decriminalized in Canada in October 2018. Since that time, many Canadian police departments have implemented policies regarding officials using marijuana that would probably shock many Americans. For example, the Vancouver Police Department says that it will not impose any restrictions on their officers for using marijuana while off-duty. The only policy they will enforce is that all officers must be fit for duty when they report to work. It essentially holds them to the same standards as after-hours alcohol consumption.

Changes are happening in the United States as well. In Atlanta, Georgia, which is a state where marijuana use is still illegal, the Atlanta Police Department will no longer ask applicants if they have smoked marijuana and consider its use as a factor in eligibility to join the force. They claim that they have lost too many qualified candidates when asking them about marijuana smoking.

Share your opinions, from both the perspective of a criminal justice administrator working in a state where marijuana use has been decriminalized and from the perspective of a private citizen, on whether criminal justice personnel (in states where it is legal) should be allowed to use marijuana while off-duty. Explain the rationale for your opinions.

As a criminal justice administrator working in a state where marijuana has been decriminalized, I would still ask the questions of, do you smoke marijuana, have you ever smoked marijuana, and when was the last time you consumed marijuana? This would be for documentation purposes to have notated in the officer’s file. I would like to have a policy of no smoking marijuana 24 hours prior to their shift. 

My rationale for this reasoning is that if a person consumes marijuana prior to being employed versus someone that says they do not consume marijuana but may pick up the habit after being influenced to try it by co-workers. If an incident should occur with an employee after consuming marijuana for the first time an incident occurs at work and the marijuana consumption played a part in the behavior of the officer, it would be good for the employer to have notated this information prior to their start date. Being a new consumer of marijuana may have played a major role in the officer’s behavior versus his conduct before ever consuming marijuana. 

As a private citizen, I do not believe criminal justice personnel should be able to consume marijuana off-duty even if it is legal in the state, they work in. My rationale for this is that criminal justice personnel are held to a higher standard and looked upon by citizens as professional persons that they go to for help. I think that if they use marijuana and are corrupt, they will possibly take drugs from citizens to consume for themselves. I think that they will not follow the policy as directed by the department that will possibly lead to bad judgment calls and the use of force issues.

Criminal Investigation Joshua

/in /by

 

. The Questioned Documents Unit (QDU) provides forensic support to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies by conducting examinations on evidence collected during their investigation as well as expert testimony concerning information contained in the reports. The Cryptanalysis and Racketeering Records Unit (CRRU) supports law enforcement by assisting in the analysis of cryptic communications such as codes found in letters, notes and diaries (FBI.gov).

                After an individual is arrested, I will obtain fingerprints and photographs of the subject and complete a number of forms that are used to start a criminal file on the subject. I will use the Buccal Collection DNA test kit provided by the FBI on my subject. Once completed properly and submitted to the FBI, the kit will be sent to the Federal DNA Database Unit (FDDU). The FDDU will take the DNA test kit and upload it into NDIS creating a DNA profile for my subject. The subject’s DNA profile will be searched against unknown forensic profiles from crime scenes across the country. If my subject’s DNA matches with another crime from another state he can be charged for that crimes as well. In my opinion this is the most important service the FBI has. This allows all agencies to communicate and share information based off of DNA evidence. The flaw is that they need the criminal to be apprehended and processed in order for the DNA to be in the system.

                In Knoxville Tennessee, FBI Emergency Response agents train how to excavate a body at the Body Farm.  The agents pair up in teams with forensic anthropologists to learn how to best identify and excavate human remains to preserve the clues and pieces of evidence that decaying bodies may leave behind. The weeklong training gives agents step by step instructions while surprising the agents with twists and surprises during their excavations. This was very interesting to me because it helps put things into perspective. Teaches them to put the victim first, which will motivate them to slow down, be methodical with their techniques and be very thorough because it only can be done once.

respond to this discussion question 150 words

REPLY TO CLASSMATE’S POST

/in /by

In your own words, what is the Constitution?

What does it say about the rights of people?  Be careful because it is not obvious what “Rights” are really in the Constitution and it would be a mistake to use that stuff “everybody knows” because it is technically insufficient and often incorrect.

Rather than taking on the whole landscape, choose 4 “rights” and give specific evidence that it is a right and from where this right emanates. Be sure what you choose truly addresses granting rights to the people specifically and not rights that you think are implied by the wording.

How would you characterize the overall position of perspective of the current United States Supreme Court (USSC)? BTW— highlighted in blue is the only acceptable way to refer to the Court the first time you mention it, and there after “the Court” is proper.

One might say that the Warren Court was more concerned with Due Process and individual rights.

This Court is likely to deal with some tough issues about privacy, and acceptable behavior towards the interrogation of non-citizens.

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTION AND WHY? (A MININUM OF 150 WORDS)

                                                              

                                                     CLASSMATE’S POST

In my own opinion, the Constitution is a system of governing each state sets as rules for the justice system to abide by to ensure all citizens receive equal rights whether in criminal or civil cases. 

The Constitution says the rights of the people is protection through due process of law. This law means the courts must follow Constitutional rules or statues in judiciary settings. There are many situations when physical evidence is inadmissible because of contamination or mishandling. The evidence thrown out could be the strength of a case. Even serial killers, rapists, and pedophiles’ had escaped punishment when their Constitutional Rights were violated through evidence handling. 

The First Amendment Right to the Constitution is the freedom of speech, religion, and the press.  The laws of Congress states that no citizen is prohibited from religious beliefs, speaking their mind, or publicizing what is believed to have occurred. This law is one of the 10 Amendment rights of citizens of the United States.

The 4th Amendment to the Constitution is protection for the citizens against illegal search and seizure. These are laws that prohibit law enforcement from entering a person’s home without consent or any establishment without the proper warrant or probable cause. 

The 6th Amendment Right to the Constitution aids individuals, who have been arrested, to a speedy trial. I especially like this Amendment because individuals who are found innocent of the accused crime are not held up in a jail cell for long periods of time for a crime they did not commit.

response6 Kavya Spandana Mandadi

/in /by

Web 2.0 is nothing but the term which in use to describe the social technologies and impacts the way how people interact simultaneously from all over the world. These are also used at the enterprise level to collaborate with the teams like on shore/ off -shore model.

 As we all know these emerging technological advances will bring the agility also on the down side they are the reason for some new threats. With the advancement and value that these technologies brings all the organizations also should determine where and how to embrace those software’s. It requires successful and careful ongoing efforts to secure the assets like infra, employees and data.

A well defined security program should be adopted by all the organizations when they are ready to deploy web 2.0 technologies in their environment. Companies should also formulate a web 2.0 policy and train their employees on web 2.o practices and security features. Also companies should adapt some hard IT policies to allow a safe landing of Web 2.0 technologies at the enterprise level.

Organizations should have a team to make decisions on how to protect their complete content and also the application data along with monitoring. This team should have the control to discover threats that involved in these kind of internet based application traffic and also to protect the data that might get from the social media applications.

With all the above mentioned in place content based security is essential to mitigate the threats when they are detected during these.IT initiatives like customized browser settings, installation of anti virus software’s, implementing multi factor authentications , developing a data loss protection solution should put in place while adapting these web 2.0 technologies.

References:

1.Jaokan and C. Sharma, “Mobile VoIP – approaching the tripping point”, 2010, available on http://www.futuretext.com/downloads/mobile_voip.pdf

2. M. Chui, A. Miller and R. Roberts, “Six ways to make Web 2.0 work”, McKinsey Quarterly, Vol. 1, pp. 2-7, 2009

REPLY TO CLASSMATE’S DISCUSSION IN 12 HOURS or LESS

/in /by

Learn about the story of Stuxnet.  Explain why this is different than anything that came before it. Speculate about whether it was a wise or unwise move to utilize such a tool, and explain why.

Here are some starter links but you are certainly encouraged to find your own information and bring it back to the group and share.

If you have cable TV you may see a documentary called Zero Days (2016), or find pieces of it on Youtube. If you have time, there is a very interesting explanation there from some people who are the cutting edge when we talk about Homeland Security.

Stuxnet from wired.com

A Great TED talk on Stuxnet

Forbes Magazine on Stuxnet

Stuxnet according to Norton Antivirus

Stuxnet has a big brother called Nitro Zeus

Scary Worm

PLEASE REPLY TO MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTIONS AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU AGREE? (A MINIMUM OF 15o WORDS)

                                             CLASSMATE’S POST

The Stuxnet development was different than any previously created virus or worm malware because it is not spread via the internet, rather it is primarily spread to a computer control system via a USB stick. Stuxnet primarily impacts and infiltrates  Windows computers, but interestingly enough, does no actual damage to the Windows system itself. Stuxnet looks for a specific “Programmable Logic Controller”, an operating system made by Siemens that controls engineering functions and different automated processes in industrial facilities, chemical plants, and nuclear power stations (forbes.com).  

I found Stuxnet to be particularly interesting because of the manner in which it is spread and the fact that, if two Stuxnet viruses find each other on an operating system, they evaluate each other to ensure they are both running the most up to date software and if not, update so that they are. Its believed that Stuxnet has infected well over 50,000 Windows operating computers, and based on the specific functionality, it does appear that the virus targets a specific PLC system and that the creators of Stuxnet were fully aware of what they were after when creating it. The highlight of the discovery of Stuxnet was it’s use to infect the operating systems of the Iranian Nuclear power plant Bushehr. It is highly speculated that either the United States or Israel was behind the creation and deployment of Stuxnet on the Iranian plant in order to disrupt their actions and nuclear program. 

I find Stuxnet to be an extremely useful cyber tool when used appropriately, especially in defense applications. The utilization of such technology by governments in order to shut down rogue or enemy operations, specifically of potential terrorist operations could be substantially useful.
                                                       Reference:

Schneier, B. (2012, July 11). The Story Behind The Stuxnet Virus. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/2010/10/06/iran-nuclear-computer-technology-security-stuxnet-worm.html#2f3de66d51e8

Unit 4 discussion board criminal justice

/in /by

 

The Discussion Board (DB) is part of the core of online learning. Classroom discussion in an online environment requires the active participation of students and the instructor to create robust interaction and dialogue. Every student is expected to create an original response to the open-ended DB question as well as engage in dialogue by responding to posts created by others throughout the week. At the end of each unit, DB participation will be assessed based on both level of engagement and the quality of the contribution to the discussion.

At a minimum, each student will be expected to post an original and thoughtful response to the DB question and contribute to the weekly dialogue by responding to at least two other posts from students. The first contribution must be posted before midnight (Central Time) on Friday of each week. The original contribution must reference the text or auxiliary reading at least twice. Two additional responses are required after Friday of each week. The responses must be posted on separate days and must be at least 200 words in length. The responses are due by midnight (CST) Tuesday. Comments that are posted late on the last day of the week, are not quality responses and will be graded down. Comments that are mere responses (I agree!) will also be graded down. Students are highly encouraged to engage on the Discussion Board early and often, as that is the primary way the university tracks class attendance and participation.

The purpose of the Discussion Board is to allow students to learn through sharing ideas and experiences as they relate to course content and the DB question. Because it is not possible to engage in two-way dialogue after a conversation has ended, no posts to the DB will be accepted after the end of each unit.

Assignment Details

Using intellipath, the text, the library, or other credible academic sources, research and discuss probation and parole. Include the following:

  • First off, all explain the basic differences between probation and parole.
  • Define the roles of the probation and parole officers in corrections. What authority do probation and parole officers have over their charges? Do they have the authority under certain conditions to disregard civil liberties such as those protected by the 1st and 4th Amendments? Why is this necessary for probation and parole officers to have this authority?
  • What is the difference between State and Federal probation and parole officers in terms of jurisdiction and inmate cases that they supervise?

In your own words, post a response to the Discussion Board, and comment on at least 2 other postings. You will be graded on the quality of your postings.

Please note that you are required to support your views by referencing your sources in all assignments. Even if the question asks for your opinion, you are still expected to support your opinion with references to published works and other materials. You may only use the text, intellipath, library, or any other credible academic sources for references. Do not use Internet sources other than those provided in the course materials. APA format is not necessary for your Discussion Board when citing references, but you are required to cite your resources. For assistance in supporting your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials, including any materials provided by the faculty member.

670 d4 respond

/in /by

student 1

Introduction

 Think back to the first day you started at your job, were you nervous?  Did you know what to do or how to act?  Most people know how to act, but what should a company do to ensure all their employees are on the same page with how to act?  The answer is issuing a code of conduct.

Purpose of a Code of Conduct

 First we have to ask ourselves, what is a code of conduct?  A code of conduct is “ a written document called a code of conduct, or code of ethics, that sets the tone of core values and ethical guidelines for employees. This document will establish the guiding principles of behaviors and decision making of all employees” (Board, 2015).  In establishing a code of conduct, companies are giving their employees a physical document to check their behavior to the employer’s expected standard.  This will help employees determine if their behavior is ethical or unethical and should help reduce the number of instances of unethical behavior.

Why is it Important to Have a Code of Conduct?

 A code of conduct is important for many reasons.  If your company is public, it is by law required to have one.  “ A well-written code of conduct  clarifies an organization’s mission, values and principles , linking them with standards of professional conduct” (ECI, 2018).  “Additionally, a code is a  central guide and reference for employees  to support day-to-day decision making” (ECI, 2018).  A company’s code of conduct is important for internal decisions and day to day operations, but also externally it allows customers, investors, and anyone else who views the company to understand the behaviors, guidelines, expectations, and vision of the company.  A company with a strong ethical code of conduct will likely have success over the long term with fewer incidents and will be highly regarded in the community over a company that lacks or has a weak code of conduct.

Issues to Address in a Code of Conduct

 There are many things that should be covered in a code of conduct.  Since there will be so many things covered, and employers want their employees to understand what they are stating, they need to, “ Create the code of conduct with language that is as clear as possible. Examples may include prohibitions on illegal activities, smoking, drinking, foul language, discrimination and harassment. You may also include confidentiality expectations, procedures for calling in sick, expected dress and appearance and reporting procedures for emergency situations. (McKay, 2018).  From previous experience, the companies I have worked for have had codes of conduct that include, tobacco use, drug policies, dress code, expected behavior inside work, expected behavior outside of work, attendance policies, sexual harassment clauses, and many others.  It is a basically guideline of how to look, feel, and act.

Evaluate a Code of Conduct

 The company I currently work for has a very detailed code of conduct.  It address sick leave, vacation, excused absences, unexcused absences, FMLA, dress code, drug policy, sexual harassment policy, discrimination policy, expected behaviors inside and outside of work, and many other subjects.  Spirit employees almost 14,000 people at locations throughout the world, so as a result they have written a very detailed and extensive code of conduct to try and eliminate any gray areas or areas that haven’t been covered that could leave the employees or the company vulnerable.  This is a great policy to me because everyone has the same information and is put on a level playing field.  I have been treated with more dignity and respect at this company than any I have ever worked at before which in turn has made me buy into the company’s values and want to work even harder.  It has made me feel like I have found my career home rather than just working a job.

Conclusion

 Writing a code of conduct can be time consuming as it must cover as many possible aspects as leadership can think of.  However, this might be one of the most important things a company can do.  Internally it shows the vision and expectation the company has, externally it helps build a reputation in the community and the world.  A positive strong code of conduct will help lay a strong foundation for a company to succeed.

student 2

What is the reason for a set of accepted rules?

An implicit rules is an understanding of the worthy practices for an association (Collins Dictionary, 2018). A set of accepted rules or morals is an inside rule that elucidates an associations standards, qualities, and mission. It very well may be utilized by the association as a benchmark of individual and hierarchical execution. It is a focal reference for representatives that includes moral basic leadership (Ethics.Org, 2018).

 For what reason is it imperative for an organization to have a composed implicit rules?

A collected set of acknowledged rules in the merger it is vital, so all representatives comprehend what is anticipated from them. New contracts will realize what is anticipated from them from a moral point of view dependent on your organization’s desires and benchmarks. It tends to be utilized to keep away from apparently “little” matters that workers probably won’t consider without anyone else. Clients will likewise be consoled that they are working with an organization that qualities uprightness and that honesty will be utilized when leading business.

 What issues ought to be viewed as incorporated into a set of accepted rules, particularly given the merger situation?

 The set of accepted rules ought to incorporate proposals from every significant office utilizing recommendations to ensure that it reacts to the fundamental hazard territories. It should represent the distinctions over all divisions. It ought to incorporate exceptionally vital subjects that are basic for the association, it ought to be custom fitted to fit the specifics of the hierarchical business, qualities and culture. It should address the majority of the state and government laws that include separation, provocation, irreconcilable situation, pay off, extortion and deception, and appropriate records keeping. It ought to likewise address how workers are found in the network. Above all, it ought to incorporate a letter from Theresa and Mike portraying the significance of the set of accepted rules and how it will be authorized.

 Assess the set of principles for your  past manager 

 For 19 years I have live by the Army and it has a very specific code of conduct. It is composed in a straightforward simple to peruse and comprehend shape which if violated can be punished under the uniform code of military justice. The Code of Conduct or ‘set of principles’ is an arrangement of standards plotting the social standards and guidelines and duties of, or legitimate practices for, an individual, gathering or association. Related ideas incorporate moral, respect, moral codes and religious laws AR 350-30 (2018).