Background: The Great Depression and World War II represented tumultuous years for Americans. From the widespread and appalling poverty of the Great Depression to the horror and excitement of World War II, Americans were forced to work together for the good of each other and the nation. The experiences of these years, both the good and the bad, forever changed the Americans who lived through them.

Required Sources: Choose one of the chapters from the oral history collections below

• A Taste of Freedom. A Little Taste of Freedom: The Black Freedom Struggle in Claiborne County, Mississippi.
• Honor and humiliation. Hard times: An oral history of the great depression
• French Carpenter Clark. Women’s Diaries and Letters of the South: Country Women Cope with Hard Times: A Collection of Oral Histories.

Recommended Source

• WWII: Breadlines to boomtimes in Films on Demand database.

Based on the oral history that you read and your textbook, consider the changes that the United States went through from the Great Depression through World War II. In your post, explain:

• At least three causes of the Great Depression and the New Deal responses to them.
• How the societal changes of this period affected individual Americans. Provide at least one example from the oral history that you read to support your points.

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Your references and citations must be formatted according to APA style.

 

 Additional Information:

As we have noticed in our recent recession is that you cannot fix a problem if you cannot determine what caused it. One of the problems facing the United States government after the Stock Market Crash in 1929 was determining what had caused it to happen in the first place. The continuing problems that occurred after the crash that led to the Great Depression also had to be identified. One the government could determine what had caused it, then they could create programs not only to fix those problems but also to prevent them from occurring again. At the same time that the government was trying to fix the problems, they were also trying to relieve some of the hardships for the people. Roosevelt’s New Deal programs attempted all of this. Despite many setbacks, the New Deal sought and achieved four main goals; economic recovery, creating jobs, investing in public works, and uplifting the American people. One excellent website where you can view many of the programs of the New Deal and review a timeline of when they occurred is The Living New Deal: Still Working for America. 

 

watch the video then analysis with this format.

 

1.            Name of film: 

 

2.            Main point of the film:

 

3.            What is the point of view of the film?  Was it overly favorable or critical of a particular group or individual? 

 

 

4.            What inferences were made in the film?  Were there parts of the film that filmmakers must have made up because they couldn’t have known this from the available evidence?

 

 

5.            What Techniques are used in the film to persuade the audience to the filmmakers point of view?  Note music, camera angle, character portrayal, etc.

 

 

6.            What evidence is included to support the point of view put forth in the film? What is the source of that evidence? How strong is it?

 

 

7.            What relevant information do I know?  Does it contradict or support the story presented in the film?

 

 

 

8.            Overall, how strong are the historical arguments in this film?  Is it historically accurate?

What the video at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgW0o-Ui94k and answer the questions below based upon your understanding of the war and the content of the video.

 

 

1.       Why did the French request assistance from the United States in Southeast Asia?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.       How is the Domino Theory related to the containment policy?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.       How did President Kennedy attempt to stop the expansion of communism into Vietnam?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4.       After which event did President Johnson dramatically increase the number of US troops deployed to Vietnam?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a.       Why do historians call into questions President Johnson’s justification for sending more troops to Vietman?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5.       Who advocated the policy of Vietnamization?  Why did this policy fail?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.       How did the Vietnam conflict end?

The Cold War in Vietnam

 

Vietnam Before US Intervention Previous

 

Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia had been a French colony since the late 19th century. During World War II, however, Japan occupied French Indochina. After Japan’s defeat, France tried to re-establish control, but met opposition from the Viet Minh.

 

After World War II, neither France nor England wanted to see the end of their colonial empires. England was anxious to control Burma, Malaya, and India. France wanted to rule Indochina. Under Franklin Roosevelt, the United States sought to bring an end to European colonialism. As he put it, condescendingly: “There are 1.1 billion brown people. In many Eastern countries they are ruled by a handful of whites and they resent it. Our goal must be to help them achieve independence. 1.1 billion potential enemies are dangerous.”

 

But under Harry Truman, the United States was concerned about its naval and air bases in Asia. The U.S. decided to permit France into Indochina to re-assert its authority in Southeast Asia. The result: the French Indochina War began.

From the beginning, American intelligence officers knew that France would find it difficult to re-assert its authority in Indochina. The French refused to listen to American intelligence. To them, the idea of Asian rebels standing up to a powerful Western nation was preposterous.

Although Truman allowed the French to return to Indochina, he was not yet prepared to give the French arms, transportation, and economic assistance. It was not until anti-communism became a major issue that the United States would take an active role supporting the French. The fall of China, the Korean War, and the coming of Joe McCarthy would lead policymakers to see the French War in Vietnam, not as a colonial war, but as a war against international communism.

Beginning in 1950, the United States started to underwrite the French war effort. For four years, the United States provided $2 billion; however, this had little effect on the war. The French command, frustrated by a hit-and-run guerrilla war, devised a trap. The idea was to use a French garrison as bait, have the enemy surround it, and mass their forces. Then, the French would strike and crush the enemy and gain a major political and psychological victory.

 

The French built their positions in a valley and left the high ground to their adversaries. An American asked what would happen if the enemy had artillery. A French officer assured him that they had no artillery, and even if they did, they would not know how to use it. Yet, as the journalist David Halberstam noted, “They did have artillery and they did know how to use it.”

Into the Quagmire Previous

 

On May 7, 1954, a ragtag army of 50,000 Vietnamese Communists defeated the remnants of an elite French force at a network of bases at Dien Bien Phu in northwestern Vietnam. The French, fighting to restore their Indochinese empire, planned to strike at their adversaries from a network of eight bases (surrounded by barbed wire and minefields) that they had built at Dien Bien Phu.

The Viet Minh, Vietnamese Nationalists led by Ho Chi Minh, bombarded these bases with artillery from the surrounding hillsides. Heavy rains made it impossible to bomb the rebel Vietnamese installations or to supply the garrisons. The French, trapped, were reduced to eating rats and pleaded for American air support. President Eisenhower decided to stay out.

 

Despite American financial supports, amounting to about three-quarters of France’s war costs, 250,000 veteran French troops were unable to crush the Viet Minh. Altogether, France had 100,000 men dead, wounded, or missing trying to re-establish its colonial empire. In 1954, after French forces were defeated at the battle of Dien Bien Phu, a peace conference was held in Geneva Switzerland. At the conference, the French and the Vietnamese agreed to divide Vietnam temporarily into a non-Communist South and a Communist North, pending re-unification following elections scheduled for 1956.

 

Those elections never took place. South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem, with U.S. backing, refused to participate in the elections for fear of an overwhelming victory by Ho Chi Minh. The failure of the South to fulfill the terms of the Geneva Accord led the North Vietnamese to distrust diplomacy as a way to achieve a settlement.

 

In 1955, the first U.S. military advisers arrived in Vietnam. President Dwight D. Eisenhower justified this decision on the basis of the domino theory–that the loss of a strategic ally in Southeast Asia would result in the loss of others. “You have a row of dominoes set up,” he said, “you knock the first one, and others will fall.” President Eisenhower felt that with U.S. help, South Vietnam could maintain its independence.

In 1957, South Vietnamese rebels known as the Viet Cong began attacks on the South Vietnamese government of Ngo Dinh Diem. In 1959, Hanoi approved armed struggle against Ngo Dinh Diem’s regime in Saigon.  President Kennedy supported the South Vietnamese government with weapons, supplies and 18,000 military advisors. 

LBJ and Vietnam Previous

 

President Lyndon Johnson was reluctant to commit the United States to fight in South Vietnam. “I just don’t think it’s worth fighting for,” he told McGeorge Bundy, his national security adviser. The president feared looking like a weakling, and he was convinced that his dream of a Great Society would be destroyed if he backed down on the communist challenge in Asia. Each step in deepening U.S. involvement in Vietnam made it harder to admit failure and reverse direction.
President Johnson campaigned in the 1964 election with the promise not to escalate the war. “We are not about to send American boys 9 or 10,000 miles away from home to do what Asian boys ought to be doing for themselves,” he said. But following reports that the North Vietnamese had attacked an American destroyer (which was engaged in a clandestine intelligence mission) off the Vietnamese coast, Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, giving President Lyndon Johnson power to “take all necessary measures.”

In February 1965, Viet Cong units operating autonomously attacked a South Vietnamese garrison near Pleiku, killing eight Americans. Convinced that the communists were escalating the war, Johnson began the bombing campaign against North Vietnam that would last for 2 ½ years. He also sent the first U.S. ground combat troops to Vietnam.

Johnson believed he had five options. One was to blast North Vietnam off the map using bombers. Another was to pack up and go home. A third choice was to stay as we were and gradually lose territory and suffer more casualties. A fourth option was to go on a wartime footing and call up the reserves. The last choice–which Johnson viewed as the middle ground–was to expand the war without going on a wartime footing. Johnson announced that the lessons of history dictated that the United States use its might to resist aggression. “We did not choose to be the guardians at the gate, but there is no one else,” Johnson said. He ordered 210,000 American ground troops to Vietnam.

Johnson justified the use of ground forces by stating that it would be brief, just six months. But the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese were able to match our troop build-up and neutralize the American soldiers. In North Vietnam, 200,000 young men came of draft age each year. It was very easy for our enemy to replenish its manpower. By April 1967, we had a force of 470,000 men in Vietnam. We were learning that there was no light at the end of the tunnel.

The Johnson administration’s strategy–which included search and destroy missions in the South and calibrated bombings in the North–proved ineffective, though highly destructive. Despite the presence of 549,000 American troops, the United States had failed to cut supply lines from the North along the so-called Ho Chi Minh Trail, which ran along the border through Laos and Cambodia. By 1967, the U.S. goal was less about saving South Vietnam and more about avoiding a humiliating defeat.
Then, everything fell apart for the United States. We suddenly learned the patience, durability, and resilience of our enemy. In the past, our enemy had fought in distant jungles. During the Tet Offensive of early 1968, however, they fought in the cities.

The size and strength of the 1968 Tet Offensive undercut the optimistic claims by American commanders that their strategy was succeeding. Communist guerrillas and North Vietnamese army regulars blew up a Saigon radio station and attacked the American Embassy, the presidential palace, police stations, and army barracks. Tet, in which more than 100 cities and villages in the South were overrun, convinced many policymakers that the cost of winning the war, was too great. The former Secretary of State Dean Rusk, who had assured Johnson in 1965 that he was “entirely right” on Vietnam, now stated, “I do not think we can do what we wish to do in Vietnam.” Two months after the Tet Offensive, Johnson halted American bombing in most of North Vietnam and called for negotiations.
As a result of the Tet Offensive, Lyndon Johnson lost it all. Senator Eugene McCarthy, who picked up more than 40 percent of the vote, challenged Johnson in the Democratic presidential primary.  President Johnson decided not to run for re-election and Richard Nixon won the election of 1968.

 

Nixon and Vietnam

In the 1968 election, Republican Richard Nixon claimed to have a plan to end the war in Vietnam, but, in fact, it took him five years to disengage the United States from Vietnam. Indeed, Richard Nixon presided over as many years of war in Indochina as did Johnson. About a third of the Americans who died in combat were killed during the Nixon presidency.

 

Nixon’s plan to bring “peace with honor,” mainly involved reducing American casualties by having South Vietnamese soldiers bear more of the ground fighting–a process he called “Vietnamization”–and defusing anti-war protests by ending the military draft. Nixon provided the South Vietnamese army with new training and improved weapons and tried to frighten the North Vietnamese to the peace table by demonstrating his willingness to bomb urban areas and mine harbors. He also hoped to orchestrate Soviet and Chinese pressure on North Vietnam.

 

The most controversial aspect of his strategy was an effort to cut the Ho Chi Minh supply trail by secretly bombing North Vietnamese sanctuaries in Cambodia and invading that country and Laos. The U.S. and South Vietnamese incursion into Cambodia in April 1970 helped destabilize the country, provoking a bloody civil war and bringing to power the murderous Khmer Rouge, a Communist group that evacuated Cambodia’s cities and threw thousands into re-education (concentration) camps.

Following his election, President Nixon began to withdraw American troops from Vietnam in June 1969 and replaced the military draft with a lottery in December of that year. In December 1972, the United States began large-scale bombing of North Vietnam after peace talks reach an impasse. The so-called Christmas bombings led Congressional Democrats to call for an end of U.S. involvement in Southeast Asia.

 

In late January 1973, the United States, South Vietnam, the Viet Cong, and North Vietnam signed a cease-fire agreement, under which the United States agreed to withdraw from South Vietnam without any comparable commitment from North Vietnam. Historians still do not agree whether President Nixon believed that the accords gave South Vietnam a real chance to survive as an independent nation, or whether he viewed the agreement as a face-saving device that gave the United States a way to withdraw from the war “with honor.”

 

The Final Collapse Previous

 

On the morning of April 30, 1975, a column of seven North Vietnamese tanks rolled down Saigon’s deserted streets and crashed through the gates of South Vietnam’s presidential palace. A soldier leapt from the lead tank and raised a red, blue, and yellow flag. The Vietnam War was over.

Tens of thousands of South Vietnamese massed at the dock of Saigon harbor, crowding into fishing boats.

In the fall of 1974, President Nguyen Van Thieu of South Vietnam abruptly ordered his commanders to pull out of the central highlands and northern coast. His intention was to consolidate his forces in a more defensible territory. However, the order was given so hastily, with so little preparation or planning, that the retreat turned into an uncontrollable panic. Consequently, North Vietnamese forces were able to advance against little resistance. On April 30, 1975, North Vietnamese soldiers captured Saigon, bringing the Vietnam War to an end.

The Cold War in Vietnam Guiding Questions

 

Vietnam Before US Intervention & Into the Quagmire

1. Why did FDR want to end France and Britain’s colonial empires?

2. Why did the US decide to help the French maintain their control over Indochina?

3. What happened to the French in 1954 at Dien Bien Phu? 

4. What did France and Ho Chi Minh decide in Geneva in 1954?

5. What was the Domino Theory and how did it guide President Eisenhower’s actions in Vietnam?

6. According to the reading, why did North Vietnam invade South Vietnam in 1957?

 

LBJ and Vietnam

7. How did President Johnson feel about US involvement in Vietnam prior to the Presidential election of 1964?

8. How did the Gulf of Tonkin incident change LBJ’s approach to Vietnam?

9. Describe President Johnson’s strategy for winning the war in Vietnam?  Why did it fail?

10. What was the Tet Offensive and when did it occur?

11. How did it change American goals for the Vietnam war?

Nixon and the Final Collapse
12.  Describe President Nixon’s plan for ending US involvement in the Vietnam war?

13. What was the most controversial part of Nixon’s plan to end the war?  How did this plan impact Cambodia?

14. What happened to South Vietnam in April 1975?  How did President Nixon’s action in January of 1973 contribute to this outcome?