reply needed

Adam Perkins        

 1:28am Apr 30 at 1:28am                 Manage Discussion Entry                  

I think that digitized music has already had a massive affect on artists and major record labels already and every year it grows.  This is not to say its positive or negative for either the artist, the labels or the consumer, everyone wins and everyone loses something at some point.  On the negative side for artists, digitzed music is impossible to secure, anyone can share files with anyone, and no matter how hard you try it will always be out these, shared for free.  Sure it sucks for them, but on the flip side of the same issue, your music is reaching people it normally might not have, which can in turn lead to more sales of your music through legit channels.  Streaming services has completly changed how people listen and buy music, so the same can be said here in regards to people sharing but more people are listening.  

Digital music has been good to record labels because they can sell albums without ever having to have made a CD, just digital downloads, this means more profits for them.  They can be angry all they want about people stealing music, sure its wrong and basically illegal, but that’s not going to stop people from doing it, nothing every will.  But they can see how being able to release a album and instantly its all over the globe, no more shipping times or waits.  

As for restrictions, I don’t see those ending anytime soon.  I think it is always a good idea to keep up the fight for stolen content and keeping the revenue where it belongs, but its not a battle you can ever really win.  There are people that are going to steal it and people that won’t, the sanctions just let everyone know where those lines are and you can choose what you do once you reach it.

Discussion

 

Discussion: Performance Improvement

Clearly the criteria, discipline, and focus that underlie the Baldrige process have been key contributors to our daily improvements. The feedback we received … has been instrumental in providing a clear road map for the journey.
—Michael Murphy, CEO, 2007 Baldrige Award recipient, Sharp HealthCare

Incremental change is how a culture of continuous improvement creates a pattern of success. In the Discussion for Week 4, you examined an organization’s actions in relation to criteria of high reliability and recommended steps for improvement. This week, you will revisit your recommendations.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by selecting the “Post to Discussion” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before selecting Submit!

To prepare for this Discussion:

Read this week’s articles on the standards for high reliability, then review the Week 4 Discussion. Draw comparisons between your organization and others, and examine any feedback provided by your peers.

By Day 3

Post a cohesive response to the following:

With the feedback and this week’s readings in mind, reexamine the steps for improvement of high reliability which you suggested for your organization. Would you change your recommendations in light of what you have learned in this course? Could your recommended steps be expanded or refined?

Support your response by identifying and explaining key points and/or examples presented in the Learning Resources.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings. Consider how your colleagues’ postings relate to the information presented in the Learning Resources and to your own posting.

WK4 respond (2)

Elizabeth,

I believe whole heartedly that adolescent who commit crimes should be tried as adults. If a adolescent was to murder another person than yes, your punishment is to spend the rest of your life in jail. Laws are created to protect us not to break it. If an adolescent is willing to sell drugs on the street than they should be fine going to jail for that crime. Their should not be a simple slap on the wrists or probation time, it should be jail. I know a lot of people would argue with me and say that they are just children. To me, than they should know better. A adolescent is old enough to know right from wrong. To know that committing a major crimes, destroys lives. There is a show on A&E called Scared Straight. I love this is show because it shows adolescents what happens when you do break a crime. They interview prison inmates and they tell the kids about their experience. I think more countries in different states should have this problem. I also think more states should not be afraid of being the hammer down on these adolescents either. No matter who they are, whether they are quarter back of the football team or the president of the school. Don’t do the crime if you can’t do the time.

Shannon,

Adolescents decision making can depend on their peers and their emotions(Blume & Zembar, 2007). I have always been on the fence on whether a kid should be tried as an adult. Do I think they should be held accountable for their actions? I absolutely do. But, I know first hand, that kids don’t always think things through.  Teens tend to act in the moment. That’s not to say that some haven’t premeditated their crimes. When the crime is premeditated, it means that person has had plenty of time to think about what their actions will be and the consequences to their actions. I believe that some kids have been tried as adults that could have benefited from some other course of action. This is why I am on the fence. How do we determine which ones acted on a single impulse and which ones should spend their lives in prison? We need to consider every reason for the crime that has been committed. Is a kid in a gang and selling drugs because this is all he or she knows? Did a kid kill the person that has been molesting or raping them their entire lives? Evaluations need to be made before considering trying a juvenile as an adult. Think back to your own teenage years. Did you always think about the consequences to your actions or did your emotions and peers lead you toward a decision?

Shannon

Blume & Zembar (2007). Middle childhood to Middle Adolescence Development from ages 8 to 18: Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ

Kim Woods

Respond to Peers:

 Respond to at least two of your classmate’s initial posts. Each response should be at least 75 words in length and should address two or more of the following points:  

• Do you agree with your classmates’ perspectives? Why, or why not? Be specific. 

• Ask a specific question to encourage further discussion on the topic. 

• Challenge your classmates’ interpretation of literature and/or point of view. 

• Do a small amount of research and share what you learn with your peers about the topic discussed in this post.

• Ferdinand Cuevas  

75 Word Count Response

  ENG 125 Introduction to Literature Week One Discussion Two

o Why might a writer feel compelled to write about literature? How does it benefit us personally and professionally?

 

 “In many ways, literature reflects historical issues and conditions” (Clugston 2014). Throughout the many different periods in history, writers have written about key defining moments in history. Wars that have been fought, the progress that has been achieved, whether it be social or technological. People have written to give insight to different cultures. People have written about religions. I can’t tell you how many religions there are including splinters of other religions, like Sunni and Shia or Catholic and Lutheran.

o What kind of writing and thinking skills do you hope that you will develop in this course based on the description of writing about literature in Sections 1.1, 2.1, and 2.3 of the text?

I think that I will need to focus on identifying and relating to emotional connections and feelings in writing. Most of my reading comes in the form of informational, gun, magazines. It’s something that interests me, having been around firearms almost my entire life. There isn’t really a lot of emotional connection with this type of medium. I believe that I can dissect what I read to a certain extent. However, there are times that I struggle and have to reread the information multiple times. As far as searching for mean, sometimes I struggle to see the underlying themes and meanings. I look to improve on all of these. I think that learning to connect to readers is important in many ways. You want to make a connection to the reader. If you make a connection, then they will continue to read the entire writing.

References

 Clugston, W.R. (2014). Journey into Literature (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Retrieved from                https://content.ashford.edu/

• Robyn Reaves

  75 Word Count Response

Writers enable us to see things clearly, often in new ways that alter previous perceptions.” (Clugston ,2014). A writer has the chance to experience what’s happening in their own personal life that may have had an impact on them. Writers often bring a powerful message to their stories and the readers tend to find a personal experience in what they are reading. Some writers write to have an impact on others’ lives. It is the chance to express opinions, but keeping an open mind.

Literature benefits one in many ways. It allows us to express ourselves, it also helps us in the understanding of other cultures that we may have known anything about. Literature also benefits us because it expands our knowledge and our learning skills. Without the ability to read and write one cannot succeed in life. It makes our mind creative to think new and imaginative things.

As a child and growing up I’ve never enjoyed reading or writing. I’ve never been a good writer so I’d like to improve my writing and my understanding to what I’m reading so I can find some enjoyment in reading. I hope that in this class I understand literature better then I do now.

References  

 Clugston, R. W. (2014). Journey into literature (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Retrieved from http://content.ashford.edu/

KIM WOODS

Respond to Peers: By Day 7, respond to at least two of your classmates’ initial posts. Your peer responses should be substantive and at least 100 words each. As your reply to your classmates, attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they reply to you with. Keep the discussion on target and try to analyze things in as much detail as you can. For instance, you might consider reflecting on why the legislation selected by one of your classmate’s is impacted differently than the one you selected.  100 WORDS • Trinity Woods  I am currently pursuing a major in Criminal Justice that will prepare me for my future profession of juvenile detention counselor.  This career provides counseling services to juvenile offenders and their families in a juvenile detention center or correctional facility. Juvenile detention counselors are typically employed by state and local government offices.  Federalism is a term that describes the U.S. system of dividing power and authority, derived from the people, between the national and state governments (Fine, T. S., & Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2016). Congress enacted the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act in 1974 (JJDPA)and was reauthorized most recently May 23, 2017.  This act is based on the idea that all juveniles and their families that are involved with the judicial system should be guarded by federal standards for care, while also upholding the interests of the community’s safety.  The JJDPA provides a nationwide juvenile justice planning and advisory system spanning all states, territories, and the District of Columbia, federal funding for delinquency prevention and improvements in state and local juvenile justice programs and practices; and the operation of a federal agency, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency PreventionLinks to an external site., which is dedicated to training, technical assistance, model programs, and research and evaluation, to support state and local efforts (“Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act | CJJ”, n.d.).  The most important part of the JJDPA in my opinion is the protection it gives juveniles from being held in a jail or prison if their crime is only considered a crime because of their age, this is called a status offense. Fine, T. S., & Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2016). American government (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/ Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act | CJJ. Juvjustice.org. Retrieved 5 September 2017, from http://www.juvjustice.org/federal-policy/juvenile-justice-and-delinquency-prevention-actLinks to an external site.     • Chad Brayshaw  100 WORDS I am a Correctional Officer working for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.  Being a sworn peace officer, the issue of gun control is very important to me.  And living in California, one of the more restrictive states in the country, can be very frustrating at times.  While it is difficult to definitively define Federalism, Fine’s and Levin-Waldman’s (2016) many interpretations can be summed up into a process in which the powers between the Federal Government and the individual States are either separated or shared between the two sovereignties.  And over the years those powers have fluctuated depending on personal opinion of the sitting Supreme Court Justices.  On the issue of Gun Control, the Gun Control Act of 1968 “Regulated interstate and foreign commerce in firearms, including importation, “prohibited persons”, and licensing provisions” (ATF, 2016).  While at the time, this law infringed upon the actions of individual states, the Federal Government relied upon the supremacy clause of the constitution that stated that any state law that contradicted a federal law would be found unconstitutional in order to enforce the Act.  Beyond that, today the issue of Gun Control has not actually been about the Federal Government doing too much but that individual states (such as California) have felt that the Federal level has not done enough.  For example, in Heller vs. District of Columbia the District of Columbia was attempting a complete ban on handguns (de Leeuw, 2012). The Supreme Court had to step in and limit the power the District of Columbia was attempting to impose upon its citizens when it ruled that a complete ban on handguns, even within a person’s home, was unconstitutional and violated the 2nd Amendment (de Leeuw, 2012). Not only did the Supreme Court’s actions limit the districts power in this regarded it also expanded the Federal Governments power by limiting (in this instance) the restrictions that individual states can place upon its citizens.  Thus defining (although just) the lines of authority between individual states and the Federal Government on this specific issue.    Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (2016, September 22). Gun Control Act of 1968. Retrieved from https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/gun-control-act de Leeuw, M. B. (2012). The (new) New Judicial Federalism: State Constitutions and the Protection of the Individual right to Bear Arms. Fordham Urban Law Journal, (5), 1449-1502.  Fine, T. S., & Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2016). American government (2nd ed.) [Electronic version]. Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/