Case Study in Critical Thinking:

The Late Paper

Adapted from On Course (p. 40), by Skip Downing, 2014, Boston: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Professor Mason announced in her syllabus for online Visual Communication 101 that final 

projects had to be posted to BlackBoard Learn by noon on December 10th

. No students, she emphasized, 

would pass the course without a completed project turned in on time. As the semester drew to a close, 

Kim had an “A” average in Professor Mason’s VC 101 class, and she began researching her project topic 

with excitement.

Arnold, Kim’s husband, felt threatened that he had only a high school diploma while his wife 

was getting close to her college degree. Tyler worked the evening shift at a bakery, and his coworker

Phillip began teasing that Kim would soon dump Arnold for a college guy. That’s when Arnold started 

accusing Kim of having an affair and demanding she drop out of college. She told Arnold he was being 

ridiculous. In fact, she said, a young man in her history class had asked her out, but she refused. Instead of 

feeling better, Arnold became even angrier. With Phillip continuing to provoke him, Arnold became sure 

Kim was having an affair, and he began telling her every day that she was stupid and would never get her 

degree.

Despite the tension at home, Kim finished her visual communication project the day before it was 

due. Since Arnold had hidden the laptop and Professor Mason refused to accept late projects, Kim 

decided to take the bus to the university and turn in the project a day early, in person. While she was 

waiting for the bus, Cindy, one of Kim’s visual communication study group members, drove up and 

invited Kim to join her and some other students for an end-of-the-semester celebration. Kim told Cindy 

that she was on her way to turn in her project, and Cindy promised she’d make sure Kim got it in on time. 

“I deserve some fun,” Kim decided and hopped into the car. The celebration went long into the night. 

Kim kept asking Cindy to take her home, but Cindy always replied, “Don’t be such a loser. Have another 

drink.” When Cindy finally took Kim home, it was 4:30 in the morning. She sighed with relief when she 

found that Arnold had already fallen asleep.

When Kim woke up, it was 11:30 a.m., just 30 minutes before her project was due. She could 

make it to the university in time by car, so she shook Arnold and begged him to drive her. He just 

snapped, “Oh sure, you stay out all night with your college friends. Then, I’m supposed to get up on my 

day off and drive you all over town. Forget it.” “At least give me the keys,” she said, but Arnold merely 

rolled over and went back to sleep. Panicked, Kim called Professor Mason’s office and told Mary, the 

administrative assistant, that she was having internet issues and couldn’t connect to BbLearn. “Don’t 

worry,” Mary assured Kim, “I’m sure Professor Mason won’t care if your project is a little late. Just be 

sure to have it here before she leaves at 1:00.” relived, Kim decided not to wake Arnold again; instead, 

she took the bus.

At 12:15, Kim walked into Professor Mason’s office with her project. Professor Mason said, 

“Sorry, Kim, you’re 15 minutes late.” She refused to accept Kim’s project and gave Kim an “F” for the 

course. 

Listed below are characters in this story. Rank them in order of their responsibility for 

Kim’s failing grade in Visual Communication 101. Give a different score to each character. 

Be prepared to explain your choices. 1=Most Responsible; 6=Least Responsible

__ Professor Mason, the instructor __ Phillip, the coworker

__ Kim, the student __ Cindy, Kim’s classmate

__ Arnold, the husband __ Mary, the administrative assistant

 DIVING DEEPER Is there someone not mentioned in the story who may also bear

 Discuss in detail 2 Critical Thinking strategies you have learned from the chapter and the videos that you will work on continuing to develop.    

Provide at least 2 personal illustrations of youre using these strategies.   

 

2. After reading Kim’s late paper who did you decide was most responsible for Kim’s failing grade? Please post and justify using a strong critical thinking argument for this choice.  Explain in detail. 

minimum of 250 words (2 detailed paragraphs. Each of your paragraphs must consist of at least 8-10 complete sentences

Discussion 2: Circumplex Model

 

Understanding the level of cohesion of a family system is important in order to determine an effective treatment plan. Olson (2000) developed the Circumplex Model, which has been used in the areas of marital therapy and with families dealing with terminal illness.

For this Discussion, you again draw on the “Cortez Family” case history.

By Day 4

Post your description of the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems and how it serves as a framework to assess family systems. Apply this framework in assessing the Cortez family. Use the three dimensions (cohesion, flexibility, and communication) of this model to assess and analyze. Describe how assessing these dimensions assists the social worker in treatment planning.

 

Required Readings

Holosko, M. J., Dulmus, C. N., & Sowers, K. M. (2013). Social work practice with individuals and families: Evidence-informed assessments and interventions. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chapter 9, “Assessment of Families” (pp. 237–264)

Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (Eds.). (2013). Sessions case histories. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing.
“The Cortez Family” (pp. 23–25)

Smokowski, P. R., Rose, R., & Bacallao, M. L. (2008). Acculturation and Latino family processes: How cultural involvement, biculturalism, and acculturation gaps influence family dynamics. Family Relations57(3), 295–308.

Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy22(2), 144–167.

 The Cortez Family  Paula is a 43-year-old HIV-positive Latina woman originally from Colombia. She is bilingual, fluent in both Spanish and English. Paula lives alone in an apartment in Queens, NY. She is divorced and has one son, Miguel, who is 20 years old. Paula maintains a relationship with her son and her ex-husband, David (46). Paula raised Miguel until he was 8 years old, at which time she was forced to relinquish custody due to her medical condition. Paula is severely socially isolated as she has limited contact with her family in Colombia and lacks a peer network of any kind in her neighborhood. Paula identifies as Catholic, but she does not consider religion to be a big part of her life. Paula came from a moderately well-to-do family. She reports suffering physical and emotional abuse at the hands of both her parents, who are alive and reside in Colombia with Paula’s two siblings. Paula completed high school in Colombia, but ran away when she was 17 years old because she could no longer tolerate the abuse at home. Paula became an intravenous drug user (IVDU), particularly of cocaine and heroin. David, who was originally from New York City, was one of Paula’s “drug buddies.” The two eloped, and Paula followed David to the United States. Paula continued to use drugs in the United States for several years; however, she stopped when she got pregnant with Miguel. David continued to use drugs, which led to the failure of their marriage. Once she stopped using drugs, Paula attended the Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) in New York City. Upon completing her BA, Paula worked for a clothing designer, but realized her true passion was painting. She has a collection of more than 100 drawings and paintings, many of which track the course of her personal and emotional journey. Paula held a full-time job for a number of years before her health prevented her from working. She is now unemployed and receives Supplemental Security Insurance (SSI) and Medicaid. Paula was diagnosed with bipolar disorder. She experiences rapid cycles of mania and depression when not properly medicated, and she also has a tendency toward paranoia. Paula has a history of not complying with her psychiatric medication treatment because she does not like the way it makes her feel. She often discontinues it without telling her psychiatrist. Paula has had multiple psychiatric hospitalizations but has remained out of the hospital for at least five years. Paula accepts her bipolar diagnosis, but demonstrates limited insight into the relationship between her symptoms and her medication. Paula was diagnosed HIV positive in 1987. Paula acquired AIDS several years later when she was diagnosed with a severe brain infection and a T-cell count less than 200. Paula’s brain infection left her completely paralyzed on the right side. She lost function of her right arm and hand, as well as the ability to walk. After a long stay in an acute care hospital in New York City, Paula was transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) where she thought she would die. It is at this time that Paula gave up custody of her son. However, Paula’s condition improved gradually. After being in the SNF for more than a year, Paula regained the ability to walk, although she does so with a severe limp. She also regained some function in her right arm. Her right hand (her dominant hand) remains semiparalyzed and limp. Over the course of several years, Paula taught herself to paint with her left hand and was able to return to her beloved art. In 1996, when highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) became available, Paula began treatment. She responded well to HAART and her HIV/AIDS was well controlled. In addition to her HIV/AIDS disease, Paula is diagnosed with hepatitis C (Hep C). While this condition was controlled, it has reached a point where Paula’s doctor is recommending she begin treatment. Paula also has significant circulatory problems, which cause her severe pain in her lower extremities. She uses prescribed narcotic pain medication to control her symptoms. Paula’s circulatory problems have also led to chronic ulcers on her feet that will not heal. Treatment for her foot ulcers demands frequent visits to a wound care clinic. Paula’s pain paired with the foot ulcers make it difficult for her to ambulate and leave her home. As with her psychiatric medication, Paula has a tendency not to comply with her medical treatment. She often disregards instructions from her doctors and resorts to holistic treatments like treating her ulcers with chamomile tea. Working with Paula can be very frustrating because she is often doing very well medically and psychiatrically. Then, out of the blue, she stops her treatment and deteriorates quickly. I met Paula as a social worker employed at an outpatient comprehensive care clinic located in an acute care hospital in New York City. The clinic functions as an interdisciplinary operation and follows a continuity of care model. As a result, clinic patients are followed by their physician and social worker on an outpatient basis and on an inpatient basis when admitted to the hospital. Thus, social workers interact not only with doctors from the clinic, but also with doctors from all services throughout the hospital. 23 SESSIONS: CASE HISTORIES • THE CORTEZ FAMILY After working with Paula for almost six months, she called to inform me that she was pregnant. Her news was shocking because she did not have a boyfriend and never spoke of dating. Paula explained that she met a man at a flower shop, they spoke several times, he visited her at her apartment, and they had sex. Paula thought he   was a “stand up guy,” but recently everything had changed. Paula began to suspect that he was using drugs because he had started to   become controlling and demanding. He showed up at her apartment at all times of the night demanding to be let in.   He called her relentlessly, and when she did not pick up the phone, he left her mean and threatening messages.   Paula was fearful for her safety.  Given Paula’s complex medical profile and her psychiatric diagnosis, her doctor, psychiatrist, and I were concerned about Paula maintaining the pregnancy. We not only feared for Paula’s and the baby’s health, but also for how Paula would manage caring for a baby. Paula also struggled with what she should do about her pregnancy. She seriously considered having an abortion. However, her Catholic roots paired with seeing an ultrasound of the baby reinforced her desire to go through with the pregnancy. The primary focus of treatment quickly became dealing with Paula’s relationship with the baby’s father. During sessions with her psychiatrist and me, Paula reported feeling fearful for her safety. The father’s relentless phone calls and voicemails rattled Paula. She became scared, slept poorly, and her paranoia increased significantly. During a particular session, Paula reported that she had started smoking to cope with the stress she was feeling. She also stated that she had stopped her psychiatric medication and was not always taking her HAART. When we explored the dangers of Paula’s actions, both to herself and the baby, she indicated that she knew what she was doing was harmful but she did not care. After completing a suicide assessment, I was convinced that Paula was decompensating quickly and at risk of harming herself and/or her baby. I consulted with her psychiatrist, and Paula was involuntarily admitted to the psychiatric unit of the hospital. Paula was extremely angry at me for the admission. She blamed me for “locking her up” and not helping her. Paula remained on the unit for 2 weeks. During this stay she restarted her medications and was stabilized. I tried to visit Paula on the unit, but the first two times I showed up she refused to see me. Eventually, Paula did agree to see me. She was still angry, but she was able to see that I had acted with her best interest in mind, and we were able to repair our relationship. As Paula prepared for discharge, she spoke more about the father and the stress that had driven her to the admission in the first place. Paula agreed that despite her fears she had to do something about the situation. I helped Paula develop a safety plan, educated her about filing for a restraining order, and referred her to the AIDS Law Project, a not-for-profit organization that helps individuals with HIV handle legal issues. With my support and that of her lawyer, Paula filed a police report and successfully got the restraining order. Once the order was served, the phone calls and visits stopped, and Paula regained a sense of control over her life. From a medical perspective, Paula’s pregnancy was considered “high risk” due to her complicated medical situation. Throughout her pregnancy, Paula remained on HAART, pain, and psychiatric medication, and treatment for her Hep C was postponed. During the pregnancy the ulcers on Paula’s feet worsened and she developed a severe bone infection, ostemeylitis, in two of her toes. Without treatment the infection was extremely dangerous to both Paula and her baby. Paula was admitted to a medical unit in the hospital where she started a 2-week course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Unfortunately, the antibiotics did not work, and Paula had to have portions of two of her toes amputated with limited anesthesia due to the pregnancy, extending her hospital stay to nearly a month. The condition of Paula’s feet heightened my concern and the treatment team’s concerns about Paula’s ability to care for her baby. There were multiple factors to consider. In the immediate term, Paula was barely able to walk and was therefore unable to do anything to prepare for the baby’s arrival (e.g., gather supplies, take parenting class, etc.). In the medium term, we needed to address how Paula was going to care for the baby day-to-day, and we needed to think about how she would care for the baby at home given her physical limitations (i.e., limited ability to ambulate and limited use of her right hand) and her current medical status. In addition, we had to consider what she would do with the baby if she required another hospitalization. In the long term, we needed to think about permanency planning for the baby or for what would happen to the baby if Paula died. While Paula recognized the importance of all of these issues, her anxiety level was much lower than mine and that of her treatment team. Perhaps she did not see the whole picture as we did, or perhaps she was in denial. She repeatedly told me, “I know, I know. I’m just going to do it. I raised my son and I am going to take care of this baby too.” We really did not have an answer for her limited emotional response, we just needed to meet her where she was and move on. One of the things that amazed me most about Paula was that she had a great ability to rally people around her. Nurses, doctors, social workers: we all wanted to help her even when she tried to push us away. The Cortez Family David Cortez: father, 46 Paula Cortez: mother, 43 Miguel Cortez: son, 20  24     SESSIONS: CASE HISTORIES • THE CORTEZ FAMILY While Paula was in the hospital unit, we were able to talk about the baby’s care and permanency planning. Through these discussions, Paula’s social isolation became more and more evident. Paula had not told her parents in Colombia that she was having a baby. She feared their disapproval and she stated, “I can’t stand to hear my mother’s negativity.” Miguel and David were aware of the pregnancy, but they each had their own lives. David was remarried with children, and Miguel was working and in school full-time. The idea of burdening him with her needs was something Paula would not consider. There was no one else in Paula’s life. Therefore, we were forced to look at options outside of Paula’s limited social network. After a month in the hospital, Paula went home with a surgical boot, instructions to limit bearing weight on her foot, and a list of referrals from me. Paula and I agreed to check in every other day by telephone. My intention was to monitor how she was feeling, as well as her progress with the referrals I had given her. I also wanted to provide her with support and encouragement that she was not getting from anywhere else. On many occasions, I hung up the phone frustrated with Paula because of her procrastination and lack of follow-through. But ultimately she completed what she needed to   for the baby’s arrival. Paula successfully applied for WIC, the federal Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women,   Infants, and Children, and was also able to secure a crib and other baby essentials.  Paula delivered a healthy baby girl. The baby was born HIV negative and received the appropriate HAART treatment after birth. The baby spent a week in the neonatal intensive care unit, as she had to detox from the effects of the pain medication Paula took throughout her pregnancy. Given Paula’s low income, health, and Medicaid status, Paula was able to apply for and receive 24/7 in-home child care assistance through New York’s public assistance program. Depending on Paula’s health and her need for help, this arrangement can be modified as deemed appropriate. Miguel did take a part in caring for his half sister, but his assistance was limited. Ultimately, Paula completed the appropriate permanency planning paperwork with the assistance of the organization The Family Center. She named Miguel the baby’s guardian should something happen to her.  

66

 

 Brady is a 15-year-old, Caucasian male referred to me by his previous social worker for a second evaluation. Brady’s father, Steve, reports that his son is irritable, impulsive, and often in trouble at school; has difficulty concentrating on work (both at home and in school); and uses foul language. He also informed me that his wife, Diane, passed away 3 years ago, although he denies any relationship between Brady’s behavior and the death of his mother. Brady presented as immature and exhibited below-average intelligence and emotional functioning. He reported feelings of low self-esteem, fear of his father, and no desire to attend school. Steve presented as emotionally deregulated and also emotionally immature. He appeared very nervous and guarded in the sessions with Brady. He verbalized frustration with Brady and feeling overwhelmed trying to take care of his son’s needs. Brady attended four sessions with me, including both individual and family work. I also met with Steve alone to discuss the state of his own mental health and parenting support needs. In the initial evaluation session I suggested that Brady be tested for learning and emotional disabilities. I provided a referral to a psychiatrist, and I encouraged Steve to have Brady evaluated by the child study team at his school. Steve unequivocally told me he would not follow up with these referrals, telling me, “There is nothing wrong with him. He just doesn’t listen, and he is disrespectful.” After the initial session, I met individually with Brady and completed a genogram and asked him to discuss each member of his family. He described his father as angry and mean and reported feeling afraid of him. When I inquired what he was afraid of, Brady did not go into detail, simply saying, “getting in trouble.” In the next follow-up session with both Steve and Brady present, Steve immediately told me about an incident Brady had at school. Steve was clearly frustrated and angry and began to call Brady hurtful names. I asked Steve about his behavior and the words used toward Brady. Brady interjected and told his dad that being  PRACTICE 31 called these names made him feel afraid of him and further caused him to feel badly about himself. Steve then began to discuss the effects of his wife’s death on him and Brady and verbalized feelings of hopelessness. I suggested that Steve follow up with my previous recommendations and, further, that he should strongly consider meeting with a social worker to address his own feelings of grief. Steve agreed to take the referral for the psychiatrist and said he would follow up with the school about an evaluation for Brady, but he denied that he needed treatment. In the third session, I met initially with Brady to complete his genogram, when he said, “I want to tell you what happens sometimes when I get in trouble.” Brady reported that there had been physical altercations between him and his father. I called Steve in and told him what Brady had discussed in the session. Brady confronted his father, telling him how he felt when they fight. He also told Steve that he had become “meaner” after “mommy died.” Steve admitted to physical altercations in the home and an increase in his irritability since the death of his wife. Steve and Brady then hugged. I told them it was my legal obligation to report the accusations of abuse to Child Protective Services (CPS), which would assist with services such as behavior modification and parenting skills. Steve asked to speak to me alone and became angry, accusing me of calling him a child abuser. I explained the role of CPS and that the intent of the call was to help put services into place. After our session, I called CPS and reported the incident. At our next session, after the report was made, Steve was again angry and asked me what his legal rights were as a parent. He then told me that he was seeking legal counsel to file a lawsuit against me. I explained my legal obligations as a clinical social worker and mandated reporter. Steve asked me very clearly, “Do you think I am abusing my son?” My answer was, “I cannot be the one to make that determination. I am obligated by law to report.” Steve sighed, rolled his eyes, and called me some names under his breath. Brady’s case was opened as a child welfare case rather than a child protective case (which would have required his removal from the home). CPS initiated behavior modification, parenting skills classes, and a school evaluation. Steve was ordered by the court to seek mental health counseling. One year after I closed this case, Brady called me to thank me, asking that I not let his father know that he called. Brady reported that they continued to be involved with child welfare and that he and his father had not had any physical altercations since the report. 

For this Discussion, choose the opposite case from Discussion 1 and use Erikson’s developmental theory.

  • Post an assessment of whether the client  is mastering the stage of identity. Identify the areas that should be  addressed in an intervention based on his or her developmental stage.  Describe how you might address those areas.
    Identify another area that should be addressed, based on  developmental stage.

Support your posts with specific references to this week’s resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.
  

Dubois-Comtois,   K., Cyr, C., Pascuzzo, K., Lessard, M., & Poulin, C. (2013).   Attachment theory in clinical work with adolescents. Journal of Child & Adolescent Behavior1(111). Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9480/3effa5ae0e44ccf80f0287be7cdbceacdb92.pdf
 

Gross, J. T., Stern, J. A., Brett, B. E.,   & Cassidy, J. (2017). The multifaceted nature of prosocial behavior   in children: Links with attachment theory and research. Social Development, 26, 661-678. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jacquelyn_Gross/publication/316669350_The_multifaceted_nature_of_prosocial_behavior_in_children_Links_with_attachment_theory_and_research/links/5a936593aca272140565ccf2/The-multifaceted-nature-of-prosocial-behavior-in-children-Links-with-attachment-theory-and-research.pdf
 

Case Study 1 Bring Your Own Device

Case Study 1: Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)

Due Week 3 and worth 60 points

Read the following articles: “The dark side of BYOD” from TechRepublic and “BYOD As We Know It Is Dead” from Forbes.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

  1. Identify the primary benefits of BYOD in organizations, and determine the key ways in which its concepts can enhance an end user’s overall working experience.
  2. Analyze in detail the major risks surrounding BYOD, and analyze the security controls and technologies that are currently available and being utilized to manage these risks.
  3. Provide a real-world example of how BYOD either positively or negatively affected an organization’s productivity and / or security. 
  4. Determine whether or not you would consider implementing BYOD concepts in a real organization and whether or not the benefits outweigh the risks.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality resources in this assignment (no more than 2-3 years old) from material outside the textbook. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Explain how businesses apply cryptography in maintaining information security.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in information systems security.
  • Write clearly and concisely about network security topics using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions. 

BUS 517 Assignment 2 Project Scope

BUS 517Assignment 2: Project Scope

 

Due Week 4 and worth 150 points

 

 

 

This assignment builds on Assignment 1 to provide the necessary scope for your project. A project scope includes many variables, the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) that must be defined prior to the start of the project to ensure that all of the details are planned. In the form of an Excel spreadsheet, Word table, project-specific software, etc., prepare a checklist document that identifies the critical steps in planning the project scope and complete the checklist in accordance with your project. Provide an explanation for how the project scope checklist should be used to thoroughly document the project.

 

Create a 3-4 page project scope checklist in which you:

 

 

 

1. Define the scope of the project in terms of the following:

 

a. Outcomes, objectives, and deliverables

 

b. Key functionality required within the new system

 

c. Primary stakeholders

 

 

 

2. Assess the current situation and future situation that will be most impacted by the project.

 

 

 

3. Prepare a quantifiable project statement.

 

 

 

4. Document three assumptions associated with the project.

 

 

 

5. Explain the uses for the project checklist and how it should be applied to this and future projects.

 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

 

 

 

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

 

 

 

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.

respond to the post below in one paragraph/ social health

For example, if you agree with someone ,’ then qualify your response with some indications that you have explored: HOW you mean this statement, some reasons WHY you think the way you do, WHY you (dis)agree, HOW such relations could be otherwise, and HOW/WHY such a vision might (or might not be) desirable. Often this is as simple as asking the question “for who?” would such a statement be true, and “according to what standard?”

_____

Prior to reading the ACA summaries, the articles and listening to the quick version of Obama’s speech on Health Care reform, I really did not know a whole lot about any of this stuff. I am not like an expert now, but I do have a better idea about what’s going on. The first thing I did was listen to Obama’s speech. His first words were talking about how if you already have health insurance you can keep your plan and your doctor (President Obama’s speech on Health Care reform). That did not happen. After Obamacare was passed my parent’s health insurance, which I was still on, had changed all their plans. If my parents wanted to keep their benefits and same plan well they would basically have to make a mortgage payment. To pay what they were originally paying, they had to seriously decrease their benefits and plans. So no, original health insurances did not stay the same. My parents are not the only ones, friends and other family members had the same thing happen to them.

 

Of the couple articles I read, all seem to be against the vote for the new health care plan. In the article “In Clash Over Health Bill, a Growing Fear of ‘Junk Insurance’ “, they interview a self-employed woman who is definitely in favor of Obamacare and told about how Obamacare helped her. They only seemed to talk about the positives of Obamacare when there are definitely negatives. This article made it seem like the new Health Bill was this horrible thing, but after looking at the comparison of the health bill to the ACA, it really is not changing a whole lot. To me they are changing what needs to be changed for the better. For example repealing the tax penalty for not having health insurance (Haeyoun, P., Margot, K., How Senate Republicans Plan to Dismantle Obamacare).

 

After all this material, a couple questions that come to mind is how was the ACA legally passed? After having it in place for 7 years is it smart the Senate is slowly making progress to change it? Do you think in the long run Obamacare will be completely repealed and gone and for the better?

____

resources

New York Times Series on U. S. Health Care Reform, watch formerPresident Obama‘s speech on Health Care reform (the 4 minute version), and read Health Reform Summary and 2017 Plans to Repeal and Replace The Affordable Care Act. 

 

 

 

250 words DQ

 Judgment

To prepare for this discussion, please read Chapter 5 of your textbook (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Feenstra, 2013).  In addition, read Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. (Tversky and Kahneman, 1974).  Finally, review Instructor Guidance and Announcements.  In this discussion, you will consider judgment and decision making.  Be sure to use your own academic voice (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. and apply in-text citations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. appropriately throughout your post. Locate an additional peer-reviewed source to support your ideas.

  1. Outlineone of the following options:
    • Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following heuristics: availability heuristic and representativeness heuristic, or affect heuristic.  Examine the use of heuristics.  How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? 
    • Identify an example (not from the textbook) to illustrate one of the following errors in judgment: belief perseverance, confirmation bias, or illusion of control.  Examine errors in judgment.  How are our judgments, including attitudes and behaviors, influenced by social and cognitive factors? 

Sociology Homework

Complete this assignment and please cite this source at least three times: using APA format

 

 

 

 

 

Witt, J. (2015). SOC 2014 (3rd ed. update). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

During all of this turmoil, the first African American was elected President of the United States. Many changes have taken place since President Obama’s election and reelection to the White House. Few of these changes have been debated as much as the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

 

 

 

 

 

For this assignment, you will use your sociological imagination to ferret out some of the issues behind this debate.

 

 

 

 Go to the government healthcare website and find three facts about the ACA. List and describe each fact.

 

 

 

 Using your understanding of theory and the chart on page 17 of your textbook, explain how a functionalist, conflict theorist, and interactionist would explain the Affordable Care Act. Be sure to discuss the ACA in terms of each perspective’s view of the individual, social order, and social change.

 

o Do not debate the ACA itself. Rather, use these perspectives to understand how a sociologist studies the Act.

 

 

 

 

 In a sentence or two, describe your personal beliefs about the ACA.

 

 

 

 

 Use sociological imagination to explain how you developed your beliefs concerning the Act. Include a discussion of a minimum of two of the following: race, class, gender, religious and political affiliations, and how being part of these groups affects your thoughts on the Act.

 

 

 

 Finally, using the materials in Chapter 2, how might you study people’s beliefs about the ACA? Describe the steps you would follow in the research process to answer this question. Be sure to describe your study, the method, and a few specific questions you would ask.

 

 

 

Your response must be at least two pages in length, using the Times New Roman, 12-pt. font. Each part of the question should be completely answered in its own section. It is required that the sections use the following headings: Facts, Applying the Perspectives, Personal Beliefs, Sociological Imagination, and Research Process. Be sure you use in-text citations as well as an appropriate references page at the end, according to APA style.

water quality and contamination

 

Lab 2 – Water Quality and Contamination

 

 

 

Experiment 1: Drinking Water Quality

 

Bottled water is a billion dollar industry in the United States. Still, few people know the health benefits, if any, that come from drinking bottled water as opposed to tap water. This experiment will look at the levels of a variety of different chemical compounds in both tap and bottled water to determine if there are health benefits in drinking bottled water.

 

 

 

POST-LAB QUESTIONS

 

 

 

1.      Develop a hypothesis regarding which water sources you believe will contain the most and least contaminants, and state why you believe this. Be sure to clearly rank all three sources from most to least contaminants.

 

 

 

Hypothesis =

 

Table 1: Ammonia Test Results

Water Sample

Test Results (mg/L)

Tap Water

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Chloride Test Results

Water Sample

Test Results (mg/L)

Tap Water

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

Table 3: 4 in 1 Test Results

Water Sample

Total Alkalinity

(mg/L)

Total Chlorine

(mg/L)

Total Hardness

(mg/L)

Tap Water

 

 

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

 

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 4: Phosphate Test Results

Water Sample

Test Results (ppm)

Tap Water

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

Table 5: Iron Test Results

Water Sample

Test Results (ppm)

Tap Water

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

Table 6: pH Results

Water Sample

Test Results

Tap Water

 

Dasani® Bottled Water

 

Fiji® Bottled Water

 

 

 

 

2.      Based on the results of your experiment, would accept or reject the hypothesis you produced in question 1?  Explain how you determined this.

 

 

 

Accept/reject =

 

 

 

 

 

3.      Based on the results of your experiment, what specific differences do you notice among the Dasani®, Fiji®, and Tap Water?

 

 

 

Answer =

 

 

 

 

 

4.      Based upon the fact sheets provided (links at the end of this document), do any of these samples pose a health concern? Use evidence from the lab to support your answer.

 

 

 

Answer =

 

 

5.      Based on your results, do you believe that bottled water is worth the price? Use evidence from the lab to support your opinion.

 

 

 

Answer =

 

 

 

**NOTE: Be sure to complete steps 1 – 32 of Lab 3, Experiment 1 (the next lab) before completing your work for this week. Lab 3 involves growing plants, and if the work is not started this week, your seeds will not have time to grow and the lab will not be finished on time.**

 

FACT SHEETS

 

Ammonia https://www.wqa.org/Portals/0/Technical/Technical%20Fact%20Sheets/2014_Ammonia.pdf

 

 

 

Chloride

 

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chloride.pdf

 

 

 

Phosphate

 

http://osse.ssec.wisc.edu/curriculum/earth/Minifact2_Phosphorus.pdf

 

 

 

Iron

 

http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/iron.pdf

 

 

 

pHhttps://www.watersystemscouncil.org/download/wellcare_information_sheets/potential_groundwater_contaminant_information_sheets/9709284pH_Update_September_2007.pdf

 

 

 

Alkalinity

 

https://www.safewater.org/PDFS/communitywatertestkit/Water_Quality_Tests.pdf

 

 

 

Chlorine

 

http://www.watertechonline.com/testing-for-chlorine-in-drinking-water/

 

 

 

Hardness

 

http://des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/factsheets/dwgb/documents/dwgb-3-6.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

 

Any sources utilized should be listed here.

 

Social homework answer 3 questions original answers due in 12 hours

Assignment 1: Discussion

During Module 4, we examine why most people tend to conform in most of their social interactions, while others deviate from the existing social norms. After you have read the reading assignment and lecture for this module, please respond to all parts of the discussion by Saturday, October 1, 2016

  1. Why do people sometimes feel that they need to socially conform to what is going on around them, even if they do not want to do so? 
  2. How do the social institutions of our country (e.g., schools, the healthcare system, the economy, religious organizations) play a role in encouraging social conformity, as well as social deviance? 
  3. In reviewing the following video “Solomon Asch’s Conformity Experiment Today” at http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/06/11/solomon-aschs-conformity-experiment-today/, describe why the individuals in the Asch experiment usually gave the same answer when they probably knew that it was wrong. 

Remember to respond to the posts of at least two other students in the class. Complete your participation for this assignment by Tuesday, October 4, 2016.

Arrow