REPLY TO CLASSMATE’S POST

Whether from a sports team, a religious group, the military, or some other close-knit group, what experience, if any, have you had with role exiting?  To what extent does your experience match the four stages of role exit described by Ebaugh. 

PLEASE EXPLAIN WHETHER YOU AGREE WITH MY CLASSMATE RESPONSE TO THE ABOVE QUESTION AND WHY? (A MININUM OF 125 WORDS) 

                                                             CLASSMATE’S POST

Role exit is really not a term I have thought of prior to this course, however, thinking back after reflecting on the definition of this term, I can think of a few times I have experienced role exit.  “The process of disengaging from a role that is true to one’s self-identity, in order to take up a new role and identity” (sociologydictionary.org).  I was born and raised southern (the bible belt) and with being a southerner I attended a Southern Baptist church, primarily because I was the daughter of a preacher.  When I was younger church was fun (playtime with friends), however, as a teenager, in my mind, the church was a critique panel and everything I did or did not do was told to my dad (it was like an ant dying under a magnifying glass), stage one of Ebaugh’s four-stage model.  As preacher’s kids, we were expected to act and look a certain way all the time.  My role exit was simple- minded at that time and I rebelled and everything that I was told not to do, I wanted to do (typical teenager right?), the second stage.  Once I was out of the house, I completely turned away from any religion (third stage).  Now, I have my faith and it is not dictated by any organized religious sect (final stage).  It is interesting to learn new terms or terms that you really have not put together before.  For me, this role exit term was one of those and I understand what role and exit is, just never really put them into sociology perspective and I am finding this intriguing.  

Data Collection: Choosing Sources (People, Places, and Things)

  

Required Readings

Ravitch, S. M., & Carl, N. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Chapter 4, “Design and Reflexivity in Data Collection” (pp. 111–144)

Table 4.3, “Purposeful Sampling Strategies” (pp. 129–137)

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Chapter 3, “Qualitative Data-Gathering Methods and Style” (previously read in Week 3)

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Chapter 5, Module 30: Purposeful sampling and case selection: Overview of strategies and options. In Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed., pp. 264–315). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.

Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, 11(3).

Yob, I., & Brewer, P. (n.d.). Working toward the common good: An online university’s perspectives on social change, 1-25.

Document: Video Field Notes Guide (Word document)

Use this guide to help you as you take notes for your Scholar of Change video.

Required Media

Scholar of Change Video #4

Topper, C. (2014). Christin Topper, PhD student, bringing the natural world to Hong Kong [Video file].

Note: The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes.

What is a good sample in qualitative research? It is NOT about size or generalizability.

To prepare for this Discussion:

Review the Guest, Bunce, and Johnson article; the Yob and Brewer article; and the Learning Resources related to sampling and saturation for this week.

Prepare a critique of the sampling strategy used by Yob and Brewer (n.d.). Include the following your critique:

The purpose of the study

WEEK 10 DISCUSSION; Evidence-Based and Non-Evidence-Based Programs

 

1 PAGE

Required Readings

Heinrich, C. J., & Cummings, G. R. (2014). Adoption and diffusion of evidence‐based addiction medications in substance abuse treatment. Health services research, 49(1), 127-152.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2018). Evidence-based practices resource center. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/ebp-resource-center

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Implementing change in substance abuse treatment programs (DHHS Publication No. SMA 09-4377). Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA09-4377/SMA09-4377.pdf Read pages 1–18.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 42. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-3922. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005.

Vanderplasschen, W., Vandevelde, S., De Ruysscher, C., Vandevelde, D., & Broekaert, E. (2017). In search of evidence-based treatment in TCs for addictions: 40 years of research in TC De Kiem (Belgium). Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 12(2-3), 177-195.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Madson, M., & Schumacher, J. (2010). Motivational interviewing and alcohol. Healthcare Counseling & Psychotherapy Journal, 10(4), 13–17.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

PLEASE USE REQUIRED READINGS AND CITATIONS.

 Post an explanation of the value of evidence-based treatment programs. Explain how the prevalence of evidence-based programs has influenced treatment practices for addiction. Support your response using the resources and the current literature. 

Evidence-Based and Non-Evidence-Based Programs

2 paragraphs.

 

Required Readings

Heinrich, C. J., & Cummings, G. R. (2014). Adoption and diffusion of evidence‐based addiction medications in substance abuse treatment. Health services research, 49(1), 127-152.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2018). Evidence-based practices resource center. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/ebp-resource-center

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2009). Implementing change in substance abuse treatment programs (DHHS Publication No. SMA 09-4377). Retrieved from http://store.samhsa.gov/shin/content//SMA09-4377/SMA09-4377.pdf Read pages 1–18.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 42. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 05-3922. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005.

Vanderplasschen, W., Vandevelde, S., De Ruysscher, C., Vandevelde, D., & Broekaert, E. (2017). In search of evidence-based treatment in TCs for addictions: 40 years of research in TC De Kiem (Belgium). Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 12(2-3), 177-195.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Madson, M., & Schumacher, J. (2010). Motivational interviewing and alcohol. Healthcare Counseling & Psychotherapy Journal, 10(4), 13–17.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

  

Explain why substance misuse and substance use disorders cannot be reliable and easily identified through screening and that less severe forms of these conditions often respond to brief physician advice and other types of brief interventions.  Explain whether evidence-based programs are more effective in addressing addiction.

PLEASE USE REQUIRED READINGS AND CITATIONS.

reply to Post

  

Reply to this post below – MINIMUM 100 words (ask a question, give advice, etc)

Citing from this book also: References

Appelrouth, S., & Edles, L. D. (2010). Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era: Text and Readings. (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

POST:
Goffman’s central concept of impression management refers to both the “verbal and nonverbal practices we employ in an attempt to present an acceptable image of our self to others” (Appelrouth & Edles, 2010, p. 196). People conceal what they do not wish to show and show what they think would be acceptable in a given situation with a given audience. Goffman’s concept of Stage Theory is that we have a front stage and a back stage just like in a theatrical performance. The front stage is what a person shows to the public, an altered appearance and demeanor according to their social situation, which is for the benefit of others. The back stage is more of the true and private self that benefits the self and close loved ones, and a place where a person can prepare for another presentation of their front stage self. Goffman’s concept of “performances” is how a person selects and acts out their required persona in accordance to society’s “stereotyped expectations” of them, as well as, the setting and the performers understanding of the interaction (Appelrouth & Edles, 2010, p.202). 

A regular day for me usually consists of being on back stage because I am a stay-at-home mom. At home with my family I am able to relax and be open with my flaws. I only have to be cautious of what I present to my children so as not to be a bad influence on them. When I do venture out, say to run errands or take my littles on an adventure, I am on front stage. This is when I am dresses appropriately, speak kindly and with respect to others, take others into consideration as I navigate through society, and follow basic social rules and norms. I could walk through the grocery store in my sweats, hair in a bun, listening to music without headphones, and playing silly games with my toddler, but all of that would not be appropriate behavior for the front stage and I would be gawked at and deemed rude and a poor “performer”. 

SociologyW1

Sociological Imagination

Watch the video Sam Richards: A radical experiment in empathy.

After watching the TED video and reading the section about the Sociological Imagination, take the viewpoint of an outside observer to examine your life.

First, pick one personal experience that was meaningful to you.

Second, pick a viewpoint different from your own. It can be another gender, race, nationality, or maybe someone from a different subculture. Finally, write about the three points listed below.

Write a 500 or more word paper discussing each assignment point listed below.

1.    Describe the personal experience as an outsider might describe it. (hint: depending on what you choose and the perspective you choose, this may require a little research)

2.    Describe how that experience was influenced by society structures (e.g. historical events, religion, or traditions)

3.    Finally review the four main perspectives and theorists related to those perspectives. What theory most applies to the personal experience you described and why do you think this theory applies?

Your paper must include a title sheet and at least 2 outside references.  Only the body of the paper will count in your word requirement.

To help you begin your first paper, I have given you an example of a personal experience, the structure that helped to shape this event, and the theory that I would apply to it. Although what is listed below is an outline, I would like you to write in paragraph form.

Example:

Personal experience: wedding

Viewpoint: perspective of a person from the subcontinent India

1.    Description: Wedding itself was short, crowd was small, took place outside of hometown, and the bride wore white

2.    Social Structure: institution of marriage, marriage laws, and religious traditions

3.    What theory: functionalism

a.    Why this theory: functionalism supports social structure that is functional for society and marriage is functional for families and households

To view your assignment rubric, please click here.

social phenomena

 

Choose one of the following social phenomena and use one of the sociological perspectives to describe it.

Social phenomena:  1. high cost of college tuition
                                 2. gang membership
                                 3. high divorce rate
                                 4. building a wall along the U.S. southern border

Sociological perspectives:  1.  functionalism
                                            2. conflict theory
                                            3. interactionist perspective
                                            4. feminist perspective

Example — I’ll explain/describe prostitution from each perspective.

Functionalism:  Prostitution creates jobs for law enforcement.  It gives otherwise unemployable women a way to support themselves.  

Conflict:  Prostitutes are typically females controlled by male pimps.  Males have power over the prostitutes, their money, and their well-being.

Interactionist:  How do you know who is a prostitute?  Prostitutes can be identified by their appearance In some cases.  The clothes they wear, their make-up and hair, and the way they posture themselves can be signs of their status.

Feminist:  Women are exploited by their pimps.  They turn over their money and are subject to the pimp.  BUT, another feminist version might go like this — Prostitution gives women the freedom to control their own bodies.  It can be a means to independence (if there is no male pimp involved).

Okay.  Now it’s your turn.  Pick one phenomena from the list and one perspective to apply.  I expect more than a sentence of two from you!
 

Working with Special populations.

 

Required Readings

Doweiko, H. E. (2019). Concepts of chemical dependency (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage.
Chapter 19, “Hidden Faces of Substance Use Disorders” (pp. 251-259)

Coleman-Cowger, V. H. (2012). Mental health treatment need among pregnant and postpartum women/girls entering substance abuse treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), 345–350.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012, January 12). Older adult substance abuse treatment admissions have increased; Number of special treatment programs for this population has decreased. Data Spotlight, Drug and Alcohol Information System. Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/spotlight/WEB_SPOT_043/WEB_SPOT_043.pdf
Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration , Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012). Older adult substance abuse treatment admissions have increased; number of special treatment programs for this population has descreased. Retrieved from website: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/spotlight/WEB_SPOT_043/WEB_SPOT_043.pdf 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders (DHHS Publication No. SMA 05-3992). Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/system/files/sma13-3992.pdf
PLEASE USE REQUIRED READINGS AND CITATIONS. THANK YOU

The challenges of working with Native Americans with Substance abuse use.

Working with Special Populations

  

Required Readings

Doweiko, H. E. (2019). Concepts of chemical dependency (10th ed.). Stamford, CT: Cengage. 

Chapter 19, “Hidden Faces of Substance Use Disorders” (pp. 251-259)

Coleman-Cowger, V. H. (2012). Mental health treatment need among pregnant and postpartum women/girls entering substance abuse treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26(2), 345–350.

Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012, January 12). Older adult substance abuse treatment admissions have increased; Number of special treatment programs for this population has decreased. Data Spotlight, Drug and Alcohol Information System. Retrieved from http://www.samhsa.gov/data/spotlight/WEB_SPOT_043/WEB_SPOT_043.pdf 

Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration , Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. (2012). Older adult substance abuse treatment admissions have increased; number of special treatment programs for this population has descreased. Retrieved from website: http://www.samhsa.gov/data/spotlight/WEB_SPOT_043/WEB_SPOT_043.pdf 

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2005). Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders (DHHS Publication No. SMA 05-3992). Retrieved from https://store.samhsa.gov/system/files/sma13-3992.pdf

Document: SPP Treatment Plan Template (Word document)

PLEASE USE REQUIRED READINGS AND CITATIONS.

 Post a description of a special population that you may work with as a helping professional. Explain two challenges that you might encounter when working with this special population. Explain two potential strategies that you might use to overcome those challenges and explain why these strategies might be effective. Support your response using the resources and the current literature. 

100 words – due today

  

RESPOND TO THE BELOW (minimum 100 WORDS) – 

Use this reference also: Appelrouth, S., & Edles, L. D. (2010). Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era: Text and Readings (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

in response to the below do at least ONE of these:  offering advice or strategy; posing a question and providing an alternative point-of-view, 

Forum to reply to: 

Alfred Schutz concept of stocks of knowledge is what is obtained by biographical and subjective experiences and stored as recipes for easy access in order to use proper typifications in different social situations in everyday life. These daily experiences are the basis for “rules for interpreting interactions, social relationships, organizations, institutions, and the physical world” (Appelrouth & Edles, 2010, p. 265). These stocks of knowledge allow us to act automatically to everyday interactions. People are able to quickly understand their role, environment, and social situation and determine how they should act and respond based off of their understood sustained meaning. Schutz said that people live in their own lifeworld made up of meaningful objects and relations that are taken-for-granted but are varied by individual prejudices and interpretations (Appelrouth & Edles, 2010, p. 264).

My own stock of knowledge pertaining to marriage in modern American society comes from my personal experiences with or understanding of the relationships of my parents, my parent’s parents, friend’s, friend’s parents, my husband’s parents, my husband’s siblings, and most importantly my own marriage. I have I obtained this knowledge by observing, asking questions, living through, or subsequently being around these relationships. I have also observed those relationships of celebrities, politicians, or other persons in the lime light, as well as, fictional marriages from books, movies, and television programs as they depict their own version of marriage. I use this stock of knowledge to navigate and support my marriage to the best of my ability. Every day I knowingly and sometimes unknowingly compare what my husband or I am doing right or wrong to what I believe to be right and wrong in the many aspects of marriage from finances, communication, religion, discipline of children, running the household, and so on. I continually use what I have accumulated as meaningful to my marriage and apply it accordingly, which most often comes from those real personal relationships that have been long lasting, and therefore hold more meaning in the area of marriage. 

Reference

Appelrouth, S., & Edles, L. D. (2010). Sociological Theory in the Contemporary Era: Text and Readings. (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.