The Control Process

/in /by
The Control Process

The control process involves three phases that are cyclic: establishing standards, measuring performance, and correcting deviations. Examine the manner in which health care leaders progress through each phase of the control process to manage organizations.  What is the management function of controlling as related to performance improvement?  What tools are used to measure and monitor performance?  Please describe at least two functions and two tools in your response. 

 

Required Resources

Required Text

  • Management principles for health professionals (6th ed.): 
  • Chapter 4: Planning and Decision Making 
  • Chapter 5: Organizing
  • Chapter 6: Improving Performance and Controlling the Critical Cycle 

 


Recommended Resources

Articles

  1. Heiser, S.  (2010).  Is your health care planning up to date?.  Financial Executive, 26(10), 20-22.  Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.
  2. Pescosolido, B. A., & Olafsdottir, S.  (2010).  The cultural turn in sociology: Can it help us resolve an age-old problem in understanding decision making for health care?.  Sociological Forum, 25(4), 655-676.  Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.
  3. Woltmann, E. M., & Whitley, R.  (2010).  Shared decision making in public mental health care: Perspectives from consumers living with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 34(1), 29-36.  Retrieved from the EBSCOhost database.

Need done APA Format NO PLAGIARISM! Please help

/in /by

The primary function of human resource management is to increase the effectiveness and contribution of employees in the attainment of organizational goals and objectives. Consider all the areas of HRM that have been discussed in class:

  • EEO and Affirmative Action,
  • Human resources planning, recruitment, and selection,
  • Human resources development,
  • Compensation and benefits,
  • Safety and Health, and
  • Employee and labor relations.

Submit a Reflective Paper in which you explain how these aspects work together to perform that primary function.  Are any aspects more important than the others?  Why or why not?  How do you believe the HRM role can be optimized for shaping organizational and employee behavior?

The Reflective Paper must:  (a) identify the main issues in the chosen area, (b) demonstrate new learning that has occurred, (c) include class activities or incidents that facilitated learning and understanding, (d) identify specific current and/or future applications and relevance to your workplace, and (e) reflect the potential impact to your future career plans or even in your personal life at home.  The emphasis of the Reflective Paper should be on parts ‘d’ and ‘e,’ and on the application of new learning.  Explore, in depth, the benefits of the new learning and understanding that has taken place.

Writing the Reflective Paper
The Reflective Paper:

  • Must be seven to eight double-spaced pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference page, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course number and name
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must begin with an introductory paragraph that has a succinct thesis statement.
  • Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  • Must end with a conclusion that reaffirms your thesis.
  • Must use at least one scholarly source, in addition to the text.
  • Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include, on the final page, a Reference List that is completed according to APA style as outlined in your approved style guide and has at least one reference in addition to the text.

Human resource management

/in /by

 

 
 

how much would you charge for this?

 

Job Description Paper (Office Manager)

 

The primary function of the job description paper is to increase understanding of your current, or a prospective, position. The following areas of the job description should be considered:

  • Tasks,
  • Tools and Technology,
  • Knowledge,
  • Skills and Abilities,
  • Educational Requirements.

Submit a paper in which you describe each of the above mentioned areas of the job description from the vantage point of your chosen position. Provide two or more ways that you would advertise or recruit someone for that position (see chapter 4 of the textbook). In addition, include a description of at least two methods of assessment used when recruiting qualified candidates and why these two assessment methods would be most appropriate.

Writing the Job Description Paper:

  • Must be three double-spaced pages in length, excluding the cover page and reference page, and formatted according to APA style as outlined in your approved style guide.
  • Must include a cover page with the following:
    • Name of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must include an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
  • Must address the topic of the paper with critical thought.
  • Must conclude with a restatement of the thesis and a conclusion paragraph.
  • Must use APA style as outlined in your approved style guide to document all sources.

Must include, on the final page, a Reference List that is completed according to APA style as outlined in your approved style guide and has at least one reference in addition to the text.

 

Discussion Response

/in /by

Discussion Response is due by Friday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Tuesday (11:59:59pm Central).

Primary Discussion Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 300-500 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments.

This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Review the following TED Talks:

Video 1: How equal do we want the world to be? You’d be surprised

Video 2: Color blind or color brave?

Read the following articles:

Age Discrimination in Employment

Ageism in Action? Ageism Inaction

Using the articles and video as resources, address the following questions:

Have you observed any examples of discrimination in the workplace? How did the incident relate to what you have watched and read this week?

Do you feel that discrimination in the workplace violates Kant’s categorical imperative? Why or why not?

What suggestions would you offer a manager who is trying to prevent discrimination in the workplace?

A minimum of 1 reference should be used to reinforce your thoughts. Be sure to include it both as an in-text citation and on your reference list at the end of your discussion

post.

Peer Responses: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply, and consider the following question:

Do you agree or disagree with your peers’ perspectives on discrimination in the workplace? Why or why not?

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

References

Peat, J. A. (2004). Age discrimination in employment. In M. J. Stahl (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health care management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Retrieved March 17, 2017

from the CREDO database in the CEC Library.

Raynor, B. (2015). Ageism in action? Ageism inaction! Generations, 39(3), 58–63.

TED. (2014, March). Mellody Hobson: Color blind or color brave? [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/mellody_hobson_color_blind_or_color_brave

TED. (2015, March). Dan Ariely: How equal do we want the world to be? You’d be surprised [Video file]. Retrieved from

MGMT440 IP 1

/in /by

 2-4 pages & a spreadsheet with risks listed

For the Unit 1 assignments use the attached scenario. Review the scenario first and then continue on with your assignment. Consider saving the PDF or printing it out for your reference.

You have been meeting with the CEO, the project sponsor, your manager, and the heads of all the other departments to discuss the project and their expectations. You are starting to be concerned about the level of risk of this project and whether or not the organization really understands it. As far as you can tell, the company has never done formal risk management, taking a more relaxed approach to risks. You are starting to develop your risk management plan; you will present it to your manager and the sponsor in two weeks along with some other project planning deliverables.

Assignment Guidelines:

  • Create a project charter and identify the key constraints of the project (scope, budget, timeline, quality, people resources, etc.).
  • Using the scenario from this unit, create a spreadsheet that lists all the project risks you see based on what you currently know about the project. List at least 15 risks. For each project risk, provide a:
    • Detailed description
    • Category (schedule, strategy, people, etc.)

Note: This list will be used in later activities throughout the course.

Your submitted assignment (140 points) must include the following:

  • A 2–4 page typed document that includes:
    • A project charter and identification of key constraints
    • At least 15 risks listed in a spreadsheet with a detailed description and the category of each

 

Please submit your assignment.

W3 Assignment – Create an Orientation and Training Plan

/in /by

 

  W3 Assignment – Create an Orientation and Training Plan
Category :  
Due Date : Mon, Sep 5, 2016 11:55 PM MST
Detail :

Assignment: Create an Orientation and Training Plan

  • Write a plan for the orientation and training of a new employee. The paper should be approximately 750 words in length and follow these directions:  
    • Decide the position for your plan.
    • Find a real job description for this position (e.g., from your experience, the Internet, etc.).
    • Determine which information should be included in the orientation.
    • Create a separate section in your plan to discuss each concept included in the orientation.
    • Identify the training objectives for each section.
    • Prepare the training schedule.
    • In an opening section directed toward the supervisor, explain the supervisor’s role in the orientation and training process.
  • Include a minimum of two sources, which may consist of readings from the University Library, your text, other selections, and your own experiences.

for Doctor Mitch

/in /by

  1. Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief

    Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

    Using the Internet, select and research an employment law case no greater than five (5) years old.

    Write a three to four (3-4) page brief in which you:

    1. Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.
    2. Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Justify your response.
    3. Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in place during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response.
    4. As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response.
    5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees.
    • Evaluate policies and processes that promote a diverse workforce.
    • Develop policies that are compliant with employment laws.
    • Use technology and information resources to research issues in employment law.
    • Write clearly and concisely about employment law using proper writing mechanic.

    Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.

     

  2. By submitting this paper, you agree: (1) that you are submitting your paper to be used and stored as part of the SafeAssign™ services in accordance with the Blackboard Privacy Policy; (2) that your institution may use your paper in accordance with your institution’s policies; and (3) that your use of SafeAssign will be without recourse against Blackboard Inc. and its affiliates.

EssaysGuru

/in /by

Assignment 2

 

Larry Landlord has recently renovated an apartment and has put it on the market to be rented for $800.00 a month. Larry Landlord has been in business for approximately five (5) years and has had both positive and negative experiences with tenants. Larry Landlord is hoping to find a good, long-term tenant for his apartment. Roger Renter saw Larry’s sign for the apartment for rent and thought the location and the apartment would be perfect. Roger met Larry to look at the apartment and Roger fell in love with it. All of the interior fixtures had been replaced and the unit had a nice large closet. Roger noticed that although newly painted, the exterior of the apartment did show a little bit of wear. Because of the condition of the exterior of the building, Roger asked Larry about any roof leaks. Larry stated that he had never had a leak and was not aware of any leaks.

 

Roger and Larry entered into a valid contract for the rental of the apartment. (Note: The issue of whether or not a contract exists is NOT part of this question. For purposes of this question assume the contract is valid and there are no issues with the contract.)  

 

Roger Renter was very happy in his new location; the apartment was quiet and the neighbors were friendly. Larry Landlord was also very happy because Roger Renter was a model tenant. Roger Renter paid on time and was quiet and respectful to other tenants.

 

The part of the country where Roger rented was rainy in the summertime. Roger rented and moved into the apartment in October. In June, a tremendous rainstorm occurred and Roger’s roof began to leak. The leak was minor at first and Roger merely put a trash can under the leak and had no other issues that month. When handing over his monthly rent check, Roger told Larry about the small leak. Larry thanked Roger for letting him know about the leak and told Roger he would have it fixed. 

 

The next month the rains came again and the leak grew larger in Roger’s apartment. Roger was not home at the time of the rain and therefore the leak damaged some of Roger’s furniture. Roger called Larry to let him know that there was a leak and asked when it might be fixed. Roger also stated that he thought Larry had fixed the roof. Larry curtly stated, “When it rains, sometimes it pours. When it pours, sometimes it leaks.” Roger did not like Larry’s tone or response and called back to ask when the roof might be fixed. Larry stated, “When I get to it.” The following day, Roger sent Larry a note about the roof leak and asked Larry to please address the issue.

 

The week before the rent was due, another rainstorm occurred and the leak was even larger. This time the leak damaged Roger’s clothing, furniture, and some precious items he had inherited from family members. Roger called Larry and asked Larry to fix roof immediately. Larry responded in a similar and condescending manner. Roger hung up the phone and threw his baseball bat against the wall, damaging the drywall and knocking out an electrical socket.  

 

Since it was the rainy season, Roger knew it would rain again and therefore simply moved his items away from the leak and did nothing to help mitigate the damage from the leaking roof.

 

Larry came into the apartment to investigate the leak and found damage from not only the leak but also from the thrown baseball bat. Roger states that the baseball bat damage was a direct result of Larry’s inability to fix the leak based on his anger from Larry’s curt response. 

 

Suppose you are a mediator. In five to seven (5-7) pages discuss the rights and responsibilities of the landlord and the tenant in which you:

 

1.     Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord. 

 

2.     Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages. 

 

3.     Determine whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Explain why or why not.  

 

4.     Describe whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and determine whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage. 

 

5.     Support each response with facts presented in the scenario.

 

6.     Use proper legal terminology throughout your responses. 

 

7.     Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment

 

 

 

o   Typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.

 

o   Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

 

o   Include a reference page. Citations and references must follow APA format.

 

 

 

Grading Rubric

 

 

 

Assignment 2: Landlord-Tenant Law

 

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explore the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely explored the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Insufficiently explored the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Partially explored the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Satisfactorily explored the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

Thoroughly explored the legal rights and responsibilities of the tenant and the landlord.

2. Decide whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely decided whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

Insufficiently decided whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

Partially decided whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

Satisfactorily decided whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

Thoroughly decided whether or not the landlord and / or the tenant had a legal duty to mitigate damages.

3. Determine whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Explain why or why not.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Did not submit or incompletely explained why or why not.

Insufficiently determined whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Insufficiently explained why or why not.

Partially determined whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Partially explained why or why not.

Satisfactorily determined whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Satisfactorily explained why or why not.

Thoroughly determined whether or not Larry has legal grounds to evict Roger. Thoroughly explained why or why not.

4. Describe whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and determine whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

Insufficiently described whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and insufficiently determined whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

Partially described whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and partially determined whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

Satisfactorily described whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and satisfactorily determined whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

Thoroughly described whether or not Roger has a legal obligation to pay for the damage he caused and thoroughly determined whether or not Larry would be liable for any direct damage.

5. Support each response with facts presented in the scenario.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely supported each response with facts presented in the scenario.

Insufficiently supported each response with facts presented in the scenario.

Partially supported each response with facts presented in the scenario.

Satisfactorily supported each response with facts presented in the scenario.

Thoroughly supported each response with facts presented in the scenario.

6. Use proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

Weight: 5%

Did not submit or incompletely used proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

Insufficiently used proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

Partially used proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

Satisfactorily used proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

Thoroughly used proper legal terminology throughout your responses.

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No reference provided; or, does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.

Meets the required number of references; most references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 15%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System

/in /by

The U.S. Court System is a complex system that includes both federal and state-level courts. The federal system includes the judicial branch of the government. This system is designed to help society interpret the U.S. Constitution and provide guidelines for society. Court cases may concern many different topics and have an unlimited number of outcomes. 

Use the Internet or Strayer databases to research a civil or criminal court case in which you are interested.

Write a five to eight (5-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose.
  2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.
  3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.
  4. Explain whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.
  5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or jury made the decision.
  6. Discuss whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Provide a rationale for the response.
  7. Use at least (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.
  8. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format

Points: 200

Case Study 1: Understanding the Court System

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Summarize the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

Insufficiently summarized the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

Partially summarized the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

Satisfactorily summarized the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

Thoroughly summarized the seminal facts of the case that you chose.

2. Explain the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.

Insufficiently explained the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.

Partially explained the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.

Satisfactorily explained the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.

Thoroughly explained the main laws that have been violated in the case that you chose.

3. Describe the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely described the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

Insufficiently described the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

Partially described the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

Satisfactorily described the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

Thoroughly described the possible penalties that could be associated with the laws that you just described.

4. Explain whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and include any related jurisdictional requirements. Explain the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely explained whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and did not submit or incompletely included any related jurisdictional requirements. Did not submit or incompletely explained the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

Insufficiently explained whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and insufficiently included any related jurisdictional requirements. Insufficiently explained the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

Partially explained whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and partially included any related jurisdictional requirements. Partially explained the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

Satisfactorily explained whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and satisfactorily included any related jurisdictional requirements. Satisfactorily explained the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

Thoroughly explained whether your specific case was heard in the state or federal court system, and thoroughly included any related jurisdictional requirements. Thoroughly explained the fundamental reasons why it was necessary for the case to be heard in that particular court system.

5. Summarize the outcome of the case, and indicate whether the judge or jury made the decision.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the outcome of the case, and did not submit or incompletely indicated whether the judge or jury made the decision.

Insufficiently summarized the outcome of the case, and insufficiently indicated whether the judge or jury made the decision.

Partially summarized the outcome of the case, and partially indicated whether the judge or jury made the decision.

Satisfactorily summarized the outcome of the case, and satisfactorily indicated whether the judge or jury made the decision.

Thoroughly summarized the outcome of the case, and thoroughly indicated whether the judge or jury made the decision.

6. Discuss whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Provide a rationale for the response.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for the response.

Insufficiently discussed whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Insufficiently provided a rationale for the response.

Partially discussed whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Partially provided a rationale for the response.

Satisfactorily discussed whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for the response.

Thoroughly discussed whether or not you believe that the outcome of the case was justified. Thoroughly provided a rationale for the response.

7. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

International Human Resource Management

/in /by

An organisation was established 3 years ago and has earned an outstanding reputation throughout Singapore. It is planning to send a team of ten senior level executives to an overseas assignment in their newly established offshore subsidiary for a period of one year to handle different aspects (roles) of an important project that requires strong team spirit and creative mind.

 

You are the Human Resource Director of this organisation and have been appointed by your CEO to prepare and equip the team members with the necessary knowledge and information of this country and the climate/culture of the overseas subsidiary. This is aimed to assist them to not only survive but also perform well in the overseas assignment as a team. 

 

The CEO prefers to send a good mix of diverse team members for this posting, in attempt to achieve a better level of creativity and innovation. Taking these into consideration, you plan to research on the subsidiary country with regard to its history, climate, culture, language, custom, working style etc. so as to cater to the following diverse characteristics/background of the assignees and their preferences:

• Different religion

• Different gender

• Different family background

• Different Languages 

• Different diets

• Different sports and leisure activities etc.

 

When researching on the country that the team members are going to stay for the next one year, you must bear in mind that these team members have not worked overseas before. Your pre-overseas assignment briefings and trainings are all very crucial to their performance in future. 

 

Your write-up must critically analyse the following aspects based on:

 

1. Introduction of the chosen country and scenario & context of International HRM (Human Resource Management) 

 

2. Organisation design and structure of the overseas subsidiary in comparison with the headquarters in Singapore (Apply Hofstede national cultural dimensions to discuss the differences between home and host countries) 

 

3. Analysis of the staffing process for the overseas assignment. Critically analyse the staffing strategy of the right candidates for the overseas assignment. E.g., In Recruitment, do you want to deploy people from within or recruit employees from outside? For selection, which THREE (3) selection tools (including test) do you want to adopt? 

 

4. Analysis on the training and development process of the international assignees. Training and developing the international assignees taking into consideration of the before-and-after-overseas posting of human resource development. 

 

5. Analysis on the remuneration package of the international assignees. The remuneration package of the international assignees taking into consideration of compensation approach (e.g., balance sheet approach) and of the before-and-after-overseas posting of remuneration package adjustment) 

 

6. Conclusion (submission and conclusions are well considered and take into account the personnel strategies of the company)

 

You can choose any country as your host country (except your own home country and Singapore) to write this essay.

MINIMUM 15 Reference in APA style (Must include website and url links for reference and in-text citations)

You are expected to write 2000+- 10% and the citation format should be in APA style.