Reading Assignment: Hartman and Desjardins, chapters 1 and 5Assignment Type: Individual Project…

Reading Assignment: Hartman and Desjardins, chapters 1 and 5Assignment Type: Individual Project…

Reading Assignment: Hartman and Desjardins, chapters 1 and 5Assignment Type: Individual Project Deliverable Length: 1–2 pagesPoints Possible: 125 Due Date: 3/27/2011 11:59:59 PM CT The BigBusiness of the Olympics and Bribery LEAD STORY-DATELINE: TheWashington Post, January 15, 1999. Salt Lake City and the state ofUtah are considered synonymous with the Mormon Church and themorality that flows from religious pursuits. A recent briberyscandal relating to Salt Lake City’s successful bid to host the2002 Winter Olympics casts a cloud over the city and state. TheSalt Lake Organizing Committee (SLOC) had assigned individualmembers to lobby members of the International Olympics Committee(IOC) to select Salt Lake City as the 2002 Winter Olympics’ site.Since November 1998, there have been allegations that the membersof the SLOC lobbied by making gifts to certain influential IOCmembers and their families. The allegations are that the SLOCmembers gave scholarships, free medical care, guns and otherexpensive gifts valued at hundreds of thousands of dollars tovisiting IOC members. IOC rules limit members to gifts with amaximum value of $150. One influential IOC member is alleged tohave received free medical treatment for hepatitis and financedland investment deals for one SLOC member. The scandal has resultedin investigations by a several agencies, including the federalDepartment of Justice, the International Olympics Committee, theU.S. Olympic Committee, and an ethics panel for Salt LakeOrganizing Committee (SLOC). The Utah legislature had created acommittee to oversee the Olympics because of the approximately $1.4billion initial costs to be incurred by Utah and the State’sobligation to pay any shortfall. That committee has entered thefray and demanded financial accounting from the SLOC. The state ofUtah projected receipt of three billion dollars in revenues fromhosting the games. Additional Information According toMerriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary, lobbying is “to promote (as aproject) or secure the passage of (as legislation) by influencingpublic officials” (lobbying, n.d.). Whether bribery should beconsidered unethical or illegal has been debated extensively. Manyscholars and business people take the position that bribery shouldnot be treated as unethical. The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (15U.S.C. sec. 78) makes it illegal for US companies to pay bribeseven if they are in foreign countries. Assuming that this is a casein which the FCPA would apply, it helps to look at its definitionof a bribe. The FCPA defines a bribe as “an illegal payment that ismeant to influence an official to award or maintain businessactivity. Payments that assist the payer to obtain ministerialactions are not prohibited (Foreign Corrupt, n.d.). Write a1–2-page paper that answers the following questions: What is thedifference between lobbying and bribery? What argument could theSLOC members make that the payments made do not fit the definitionof an illegal bribe (under the FCPA)? What do you think is theappropriate punishment for the violation of ethical and legalprinciples? Should the remedies be limited to the expulsion of themembers who violated those principles, or should the entirecommunity be held responsible? Your submitted assignment (125points) must include a 1–2-page Word document that contains youranswers to the questions listed. Include a reference page (ifapplicable) in APA format. Grading: You will be graded on theaccuracy of your answers, the quality of your responses, and youroverall understanding of bribery, lobbying, and ethical and legalbusiness decisions. References The big business of the Olympics andbribery. (1999, January 15). The Washington Post. Foreign CorruptPractices Act (FCPA). (n.d.). Retrieved November 19, 2009, from theUnited States Department of Justice Web site:http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/ Lobbying. (n.d.).Retrieved November 19, 2009, from Merriam-Webster Dictionary Website: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Lobbying%20 Pleasesubmit your assignment. For assistance with your assignment, pleaseuse your text, Web resources, and all course materials. UnitMaterials Assignment Type: Discussion Board Deliverable Length: 3-5paragraphs Points Possible: 75 Due Date: 3/27/2011 11:59:59 PM CTWhen is a web page creator subject to a state’s jurisdiction?Creating and maintaining a web page that is accessible fromanywhere in the world poses new jurisdictional issues. In hisarticle, Christopher Wolf, an attorney at a Washington D.C. lawfirm, explains the evolving law on jurisdiction on the internet.The question is whether a court has personal jurisdiction of anindividual just because the individual posts a website. Mr. Wolfsummarizes the law relating to that issue. Part 1: After readingthis article, select a Web site and analyze whether the websitecreator would be subject to jurisdiction in the examples given.Part 2: Look at Mr. Wolf’s article titled Standards for InternetJurisdiction. Read all sections of the article including theconclusion. Answer the following questions: Why is personaljurisdiction an issue for those who post websites? What are somereasons that a website owner might be concerned with whether acourt is able to obtain personal jurisdiction over him or her? Whatis normally required for a court to have personal jurisdiction?When is a court required to use long-arm jurisdiction? Why islong-arm jurisdiction an issue for those who create or post webpages? According to the Wolf article, the courts have imposed an”interactive-passive” test of jurisdiction. Explain thatdistinction. According to the Wolf article, is advertising on theweb alone enough to confer personal jurisdiction? this is anassignment and a discussion question….need help QUESTION TITLE :- Hartman and Desjardins, chap. 1 and 5 Assignment (attachment)

Looking for a similar assignment? Get help from our qualified experts!

Order Now

Related Posts