Week 7 EN304 Research paper final

Week 7 EN304 Research paper final

I’m studying for my English class and don’t understand how to answer this. Can you help me study?

Unit 7 Assessment Research Paper Final

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 120
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Develop: Research Paper

Evaluation Title: Research Paper Final Draft

  • The completed paper will be formatted in APA and include:
    • A title page in APA format
    • An abstract in APA format
    • 8-10 pages of researched content.
    • Introduction that includes: statement of the problem, definition of terms, claim statement, significance of the study, thesis
    • Body of the paper that includes: background for the research, presentation and analysis of the data, discussion of the research and data
    • Conclusion statement: analytical summary, thesis reworded, recommendations
    • A Reference Page(s) in APA format
    • Provide in-text citations in APA format
  • Please submit both the rough draft and the final draft for the research paper along with the completed literature review.
  • Clearly label each paper when you save them as rough draft, final draft, and literature review.

Estimated time to complete: 6 hours

Rubric

EN304 Unit 7 Assessment Research Paper Final

EN304 Unit 7 Assessment Research Paper Final

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic

5.0 pts

5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.

4.0 pts

4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.

3.0 pts

3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.

2.0 pts

2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.

1.0 pts

1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.

0.0 pts

0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or ViewsEN304-CO3

20.0 pts

5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).

18.0 pts

4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

16.0 pts

3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.

14.0 pts

2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(s) are identified.

12.0 pts

1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches

0.0 pts

0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentEN304-CO2

20.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

18.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

16.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

14.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

12.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

20.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

18.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

16.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

14.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

12.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

10.0 pts

5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.

9.0 pts

4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.

8.0 pts

3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.

6.0 pts

2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.

2.0 pts

1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.

0.0 pts

0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications

10.0 pts

5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.

8.0 pts

4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.

6.0 pts

3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.

4.0 pts

2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.

2.0 pts

1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.

0.0 pts

0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting

20.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

18.0 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

16.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

14.0 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

12.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I

15.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

14.0 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

12.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

11.0 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

9.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

15.0 pts

Total Points: 120.0

Next

"Get 15% discount on your first 3 orders with us"
Use the following coupon
"FIRST15"

Order Now

Related Posts